• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP- Pandemic relief efforts did not reach immigrant families

Lance

MPH, CSP & CIT Retired, CHMM Emeritus
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/pandemic-relief-efforts-did-not-reach-immigrant-families

Pandemic relief efforts did not reach immigrant families


Stephanie Soucheray, MA

Today at 4:41 p.m.

COVID-19
Immigrant families living in the United States took some of the hardest economic hits during the COVID-19 pandemic, but benefited less from government assistance and relief programs than families with US-born caregivers.

The findings come from a group of researchers at Drexel University and were published today in JAMA Health Forum. The researchers looked at who exactly accessed the pandemic relief packages passed by Congress between March 2020 and March 2021 that offered assistance for food and mortgage and rent payments.

The study built on data collected as part of the ongoing repeat cross-sectional Children's HealthWatch (CHW) study.

The researchers surveyed 1,396 caregivers in Boston, Baltimore, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, and Little Rock. Families with children aged 4 and younger were surveyed before the pandemic, and followed-up once between September of 2020 and June of 2021, during which time they were questioned about food insecurity, housing payments, and whether they partook in economic impact payments (EIP) in the form of stimulus checks and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

SNAP enrollment increased from 36 million people in 2019 to 44 million in 2020 to help families facing food insecurity. Similarly, the Internal Revenue Service sent out three rounds of EIPs to over 92% of US households over the course of first year of the pandemic—in amounts ranging from $600 to $1,400 per adult and $500 to $1,400 per child—in an effort to address basic needs, including housing.

Of the study participants, 417 (30.0%) children had an immigrant mother. A total of 1,086 caregivers (80.8%) were renters. Among 1,393 responses, 716 caregivers (51.4%) had no education beyond high school, and nearly all children (1238 of 1388 responses; 89.2%) were publicly insured, the authors said.

Immigrant mothers less likely to access SNAP and EIP

Families led by immigrant mothers were significantly more likely to experience food insecurity and have trouble paying for housing than their US-born peers in the months following the pandemic. Immigrant mothers were 63% more likely to say their family suffered from a lack of food, and 21% more likely to say they were behind on rent.

However, only 74% of families with immigrant mothers participated in EIP or SNAP, compared with 96% of families with US-born mothers.

"Our results show that SNAP and the federal government's stimulus checks played a major role in reducing household hardships like food insecurity and inability to afford rent during the pandemic, but too many immigrant families were restricted or unable to use these programs," lead author Felice Le-Scherban, PhD, an associate professor in Drexel's Dornsife School of Public Health, said in a press release on the study.

Lawful immigrants without social security numbers were not eligible for the first round of stimulus checks, and may have been fearful to try to access SNAP, the authors said.

Many lawfully present immigrants were prohibited from benefits, while many of those who qualified were afraid to participate after facing anti-immigrant rhetoric related to benefits

"Many lawfully present immigrants were prohibited from benefits, while many of those who qualified were afraid to participate after facing anti-immigrant rhetoric related to benefits," Le-Scherban said.

The study found families with Latino caregivers and caregivers of other race or ethnicity had lower odds of EIP participation than families with White, non-Latino caregivers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.16, and 0.26, respectively).

Families with immigrant mothers had far lower odds of program participation than families with US-born mothers for SNAP only (aOR, 0.30), for EIP only (aOR, 0.15), and for both programs together (aOR, 0.07), the authors found.

"Our results illuminate the persistence of substantial hardship disparities among families with young children even in the presence of federal COVID-19 relief programs," the authors concluded. "This represents a missed opportunity for policies that not only alleviate hardships among all families but also reduce disparities."
 
Back
Top Bottom