• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP- NEWS BRIEFS October 30, 2023

Lance

MPH, CSP & CIT Retired, CHMM Emeritus
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/all-news

CDC weighs in on JN.1 COVID-19 variant developments



News brief

47 minutes ago.
Lisa Schnirring
Topics

COVID-19

In a recent respiratory virus update, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said it is monitoring the spread of BA.2.86, as well as JN.1, a SARS-CoV-2 variant that is part of the same lineage and contains an extra spike mutation.

Scientists have been tracking BA.2.86 because of its numerous mutations, and in recent weeks, they identified JN.1 as a related variant that has the L455S mutation, which has concerning immune-evasion properties. Some have seen signs of a growth advantage in a few European countries.

JN.1 was detected in the United States in September and has also been identified in 11 other countries, the CDC said. It added that nearly all viruses circulating in the United States now are part of the XBB family and that JN.1 makes up less than 0.1% of SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

The CDC said initial data suggest that updated COVID vaccines will help protect against BA.2.86, and it expects a similar effect against JN.1. It also said an analysis from the federal government’s SARS-CoV-2 Interagency Group suggests treatments and testing will remain effective.

"For as long as we have COVID-19, we’ll have new variants. Nearly all represent relatively small changes compared with previous variants. CDC and other agencies monitor for impacts of new variants on vaccines, tests, and treatments, and will alert the public quickly if anything concerning is detected," the CDC said.


FDA warns of infection risk from certain over-the-counter eye drops


News brief

52 minutes ago.
Lisa Schnirring
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 27 warned consumers to avoid buying and stop using 26 over-the-counter eye drop products, including some from major chain stores, owing to potential infection risk.

So far, no illnesses have been reported. However, inspection at the manufacturing facility, not named in the FDA statement, turned up "insanitary" conditions and positive bacterial results from environmental samples in critical drug production areas. The products are intended to be sterile.

Products on the FDA's list include eye lubricants and dry-eye relief. The FDA said it urged the manufacturer to recall the products on October 25. The eye drops are marketed under six brands, including CVS Health, Leader (Cardinal Health), Rugby (Cardinal Health), Rite Aid, Target Up and Up, and Velocity Pharma.

The FDA said CVS, Rite Aid, and Target are removing the products from their shelves and websites, but eye drops under the Leader, Rugby, and Velocity brands may still be available for purchase in stores and online.


Study: Regardless of variant, half of long-COVID patients fail to improve after 18 months


News brief

Today at 2:54 p.m.
Stephanie Soucheray, MA
Topics

COVID-19
More than 50% of long-COVID patients failed to improve 1.5 years after their initial diagnosis, according to a new study based on cases seen at a Danish post-COVID clinic, both before and after the Omicron variant period. The study was published yesterday in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

The analysis included 806 patients who were infected with the wild-type strain, Alpha, Delta, or Omicron strain. All case-patients had been referred to a long COVID clinic with symptoms persisting at least 12 weeks from onset of COVID-19. Seventy percent of participants were female, with a median age of 48.

Patients were given a post-COVID symptom questionnaire (PCQ), and standard health scores, four times between enrollment and 18 months of follow-up. The first clinic visit for long COVID occurred an average of 7 months after acute infection. Patients were grouped according to the period of transmission of predominant SARS-CoV-2 variants, with 69% of patients infected during the wild-type period and 9%, 7%, and 15% infected in the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods, respectively.

Omicron patients had lower quality of life


The authors found that patients infected in the Delta period had significantly more severe long COVID initially, with a mean PCQ score of 43, compared with 38 for patients infected in the wild-type period.

Patients infected in the Omicron period did not differ in PCQ score (median 40) compared to wild-type patients (median 38) or to pre-Omicron patients (median 38). However, patients infected with Omicron had a lower health-related quality of life compared to patients infected with wild-type strain.

At 1.5 year after infection, patients had no clinically meaningful decline in severity of long COVID.

"At 1.5 year after infection, patients had no clinically meaningful decline in severity of long COVID, and 57% (245/429) of patients failed to improve 1.5 years after infection, with no differences between variants," the authors wrote.

Overall, PCQ scores fell 7 to 10 months post-infection, then plateaued between 10 and 18 months, Overall median PCQ score declined from 38 at 7 months to 33 at 18-month follow-up.

"In some patients, long COVID may last for more than 2 years after infection, which is supported by our data," the authors concluded.


40% of oldest British Columbians hadn't had COVID by July, leaving them more vulnerable


News brief

Today at 1:20 p.m.
Mary Van Beusekom, MS
Topics

COVID-19

By July 2023, more than 80% of residents of Lower Mainland, British Columbia (BC), younger than age 50 had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and may have some protection against infection, but more than 40% of those aged 80 or older remained uninfected and thus were at highest risk for hospitalization and death, according to a study today in CMAJ.

In their ninth survey of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Lower Mainland residents, a team led by BC Centre for Disease Control researchers estimated infection-hospitalization rates (IHRs) and infection-fatality rates (IFRs) by age and sex for the sixth to seventh (Delta/Omicron-BA.1 variants), seventh to eighth (Omicron BA.2/BA.5), and eighth to ninth (Omicron BA.5/BQ.1) surveys.

"About 10%, 40% and 60% of residents were infected with SARS-CoV-2 by the sixth (September 2021), seventh (March 2022) and eighth (July 2022) serosurveys," the study authors wrote. "We conducted the ninth (December 2022) and tenth (July 2023) serosurveys and sought to assess risk of severe outcomes from a first-ever SARS-CoV-2 infection during intersurvey periods."

1 in 30 elderly may be hospitalized


By July 2023, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was higher than 80% among adults younger than 50 years but less than 60% among those aged 80 and older.

We estimated about 1 hospital admission for COVID-19 per 300 newly infected children younger than 5 years versus about 1 per 30 newly infected adults aged 80 years and older, with no deaths from COVID-19 among children but about 1 death per 80 newly infected adults aged 80 years and older.

Period-specific IHRs and IFRs were consistently less than 0.3% and 0.1%, respectively. Age-specific IHRs and IFRs among all adults were less than 1.0% to 0.1%, respectively, but were 3.3% and 1.0% among those 80 and older (IHRs, 4.7%, 2.2% and 3.5%; IFRs, 3.3%, 0.6% and 1.3% during the sixth to seventh, seventh to eighth, and eighth to ninth periods, respectively).

"During the eighth to ninth period, we estimated about 1 hospital admission for COVID-19 per 300 newly infected children younger than 5 years versus about 1 per 30 newly infected adults aged 80 years and older, with no deaths from COVID-19 among children but about 1 death per 80 newly infected adults aged 80 years and older during that period," the researchers wrote.

ALL BRIEFS
 
Back
Top Bottom