• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP COVID-19 SCAN: Vaccine-generated Omicron antibodies; Review of early CDC COVID-19 test errors

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/12/covid-19-scan-dec-16-2021

COVID-19 Scan for Dec 16, 2021
Vaccine-generated Omicron antibodies; Review of early CDC COVID-19 test errors
Filed Under:
COVID-19


Study finds low Omicron antibody response with COVID-19 vaccines

Only 20% and 24% of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine recipients in a Chinese study had detectable neutralizing antibodies against two isolates of the highly transmissible Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant, while recipients of the Coronavac vaccine had no antibodies against either isolate.
The study, published today in Clinical Infectious Diseases after appearing on a preprint site 2 days ago, was led by University of Hong Kong researchers, who isolated Omicron strains HKU691 and HKU344-R346K from patients.
Only 20% and 24% of Pfizer vaccinees had antibodies against HKU691 and HKU344-R346K, respectively. None of the Coronavac recipients had antibodies against either strain. Among Pfizer recipients, the geometric mean antibody neutralization titers (GMT) of the Omicron isolates were 35.7- to 39.9-fold lower than those against the original 2020 strain.
The GMT of both isolates were significantly lower than those against the Beta (B1351) and Delta (B1617.2) variants, and there was no significant differences in the GMT of the Omicron variants. Coronavac is made by Beijing-based Sinovac and is the world's most-used COVID vaccine, accounting for almost half of the 8.6 billion global doses administered to date.
"Omicron variant escapes neutralizing antibodies elicited by BNT162b2 [Pfizer] or Coronavac," the authors concluded. "The additional R346K mutation did not affect the neutralization susceptibility. Our data suggest that the Omicron variant may be associated with lower COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness."
Dec 16 Clin Infect Dis study

Internal review shows first CDC COVID-19 tests inaccurate, contaminated

The first COVID-19 tests distributed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were prone to false-positives due to flaws in assay design and contamination in assay components, according to an internal review of the tests published yesterday in PLOS One.
After the first SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence was obtained from a patient in Wuhan, China, on Jan 12, 2020, the CDC began to develop a Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel to identify the virus. The first tests were distributed to public health labs on Feb 5. Reports of false-positives soon followed.
The tests were composed of a diagnostic panel targeting three viral nucleocapsid gene loci (N1, N2, and N3 primers and probes), of which the N1 component was contaminated, allowing for more false-positives (2%).
CDC scientists were able to fix the N1 component, but N3 eventually had to be removed from the diagnostic panel because of a design flaw and was not included in the test that received emergency use authorization. According to a press release on the study, two molecules in the N3 probe frequently bound to each other in the absence of any virus, triggering a false positive test results.
"We conclude that flaws in both assay design and handling of the 'bulk' material caused the problems with the first lot of the 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel," the authors wrote.
Dec 15 PLOS One study
Dec 15 PLOS press release
 
Back
Top Bottom