• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP COVID-19 SCAN: COVID-19 spread in schools; COVID vaccine & blood cancers

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2021/04/covid-19-scan-apr-19-2021


COVID-19 Scan for Apr 19, 2021
COVID-19 spread in schools; COVID vaccine & blood cancers
Filed Under:
COVID-19


Study: Indoor school sports most likely to spread COVID-19

A study in an Atlanta school district revealed that the highest secondary COVID-19 attack rates were in indoor, high-contact sports settings (23.8%), staff meetings or lunches (18.2%), and elementary school classrooms (9.5%), and that staff were more susceptible to COVID-19 than students were.
The study, published late last week in Clinical Infectious Diseases, tracked COVID-19 cases and case contacts from Dec 11, 2020, through Jan 22, 2021, in a district that included eight elementary schools, two middle schools, and one high school. Students were in-person 4 days per week and wore masks, and desks were spaced 3 to 6 feet apart.
All cases were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction testing. Secondary attack rate (SAR)?which is the percent of case contacts who become infected?was calculated by setting (classroom, bus, indoor sports), index case roll (student or staff), symptom status (asymptomatic or symptomatic), and time of exposure. Eighty-six primary cases were included in the analysis, involving 33 staff and 53 students, who generated 1,119 contacts (112 staff and 1,007 students).
Among contacts, 9.8% tested positive. The overall SAR was 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8% to 10.9%).
SAR was highest in indoor sports settings (including basketball, wrestling, and cheerleading) (23.8%; 95% CI, 12.7%?33.3%), interactions among staff (group lunches, staff meetings) (18.2%; 95% CI, 4.5%?31.8%), and in elementary school classrooms (9.5%; 95% CI, 6.5%?12.5%).
Symptomatic index cases had a higher SAR than asymptomatic cases?10.9% versus 3.0%.
"Staff were overrepresented among index cases; while they made up approximately 20% of persons attending school in person, they accounted for nearly 40% of cases," the authors concluded. "This may, in part, be because adults are more likely to be symptomatic, and having symptoms is associated with a higher risk of transmission both in this investigation and others."
Apr 17 Clin Infect Dis study

COVID vaccine may trigger less immune response in blood cancer patients

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may not fully protect people with the blood cancers chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM), according to two studies released late last week in Blood.
The first study found that only 39.5% of 167 Israelis studied who had CLL had a positive antibody-mediated response to the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 100% of 53 controls.
CLL patients currently undergoing cancer treatment had significantly lower response rates to the vaccine than people who had completed treatment and were in remission (16% vs 79%). Patients who hadn't yet begun treatment had a 55.5% immune response rate. Likewise, people who had completed treatment at least 1 year before vaccination had a 94% response rate, compared with 50% among those undergoing treatment within the last year.
Because clinical trials of coronavirus vaccines didn't include people with blood cancers, who are prone to severe illness and complications, measuring their effectiveness in this population is important, the researchers said. They said a booster dose of the vaccine may be needed for CLL patients and that similar results would be expected for the Moderna vaccine, which they didn't test.
"Even though response rates were not optimal, patients with CLL should still get the vaccine and, if appropriate, it may be better to do so before CLL treatment starts although the disease itself may affect the response," lead author Yair Herishanu, MD, said in an American Society of Hematology news release.
The second study, from Greece, provided similar results after one dose of the Pfizer vaccine in older MM patients. Twenty-two days after the first dose of the vaccine, measurable neutralizing antibodies were found in 20.6% of 48 MM patients, compared with 32.5% of 104 healthy controls. Median patient age was 83.
Of the MM patients, 72.9% were receiving chemotherapy, four were in remission and not receiving therapy, and nine had precancerous MM. The authors said that chemotherapy appears to blunt production of neutralizing antibodies after one vaccine dose and that older MM patients would need a second dose for a more robust immune response.
Apr 16 Blood CLL study and MM study
Apr 16 American Society of Hematology news release
 
Back
Top Bottom