• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP - California laws tied to higher kindergarten vaccine rates

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-pers...a-laws-tied-higher-kindergarten-vaccine-rates

California laws tied to higher kindergarten vaccine rates
Filed Under:
Childhood Vaccines
Stephanie Soucheray | News Reporter | CIDRAP News
| Jul 03, 2019

From 2014 to 2016, California authorities took three separate actions meant to increase childhood vaccination rates, and a new study published yesterday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) suggests these interventions were successful.
The observational study involved two bills and an educational campaign: In 2014, California passed a bill requiring parents to prove they had discussed the risks of not vaccinating their children with a healthcare provider before getting a personal belief exemption; in 2016 legislators took that one step further and banned all personal belief exemptions.
In between those two laws, in 2015, state and local health departments launched an educational campaign to educate school staff on conditional admission criteria that allowed students more time to catch up on vaccinations.
[h=3]Limiting contacts among unvaccinated kids[/h] Prior to the interventions, the statewide rate of kindergartners without an up-to-date status for required vaccinations increased to 9.84% in 2013 and then decreased after the interventions to 4.87% during 2017. The percentage chance for within-school contact among kindergartners without up-to-date vaccination status decreased from 26.02% during 2014 to 4.56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.21%-4.99%) during 2017.
What's more, the authors noted a significant reduction of the number of communities with a high concentration of schools with high rates of kindergartners without up-to-date vaccination status.
"During 2012-2013, there were 124 clusters that contained 3,026 schools with high rates of kindergartners without up-to-date vaccination status. During 2014-2015, there were 93 clusters that contained 2,290 schools with high rates of kindergartners without up-to-date vaccination status. During 2016-2017, there were 110 clusters that contained 1,613 (95% CI, 1,565-1,691) schools," the authors wrote.
S. Cassandra Pingali, MPH, MS, of Emory University and the lead author of the study, told CIDRAP News that the reduction in these clusters of unvaccinated kids is a key finding.
"We noted a big decrease in the likelihood that a not-up-to-date kindergartener would have contact with another not-up-to-date kindergartner within they school," Pingali said. "By decreasing the clustering and contact of not-up-to-date kindergartners, there is an improvement in community immunity."
[h=3]California as national example[/h] The study comes as California considers another proposed law, SB-276, which relates to limiting medical exemptions. The bill, which passed in the State Assembly in May, would allow only childhood medical vaccine exemptions for the reasons recognized by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
SB-276 would also allow the California Department of Public Health to review medical exemptions from doctors who have written five or more in a year, Pingali said.
California, along with Mississippi, Maine, New York and West Virginia, is one of a handful of states that do not offer exemptions from vaccination requirements for nonmedical reasons. The state enacted the 2014 and 2016 bills in response to large outbreaks of pertussis and measles.
"The United States is currently experiencing the worst system failure regarding measles vaccination in a quarter-century, with more cases of measles diagnosed already in 2019 than in any full calendar year since 1994," writes Matthew M. Davis, MD, and Seema K. Shah, JD, of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, in a commentary on the study.
The two suggest that results seen in California support an argument for national limits on vaccine exemptions for personal belief reasons.
"The best way to remedy the current system failure regarding measles vaccination may be to adopt a unified national approach to prohibit nonmedical exemptions, and thereby regain the degree of nationwide protection against vaccine-preventable disease from which children and other community members will benefit," the experts said.
See also:
Jul 2 JAMA study
Jul 2 JAMA commentary
 
Back
Top Bottom