• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Chin J Chem Eng . Meltblown fabric vs nanofiber membrane, which is better for fabricating personal protective equipments

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Chin J Chem Eng


. 2020 Nov 23.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.10.022. Online ahead of print.
Meltblown fabric vs nanofiber membrane, which is better for fabricating personal protective equipments


Junwei Wu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hongjia Zhou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jingyi Zhou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xiao Zhu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bowen Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shasha Feng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhaoxiang Zhong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lingxue Kong[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Weihong Xing[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a great demand on the personal protection products such as reusable masks. As a key raw material for masks, meltblown fabrics play an important role in rejection of aerosols. However, the electrostatic dominated aerosol rejection mechanism of meltblown fabrics prevents the mask from maintaining the desired protective effect after the static charge degradation. Herein, novel reusable masks with high aerosols rejection efficiency were fabricated by the introduction of spider-web bionic nanofiber membrane (nano cobweb-biomimetic membrane). The reuse stability of meltblown and nanofiber membrane mask was separately evaluated by infiltrating water, 75% alcohol solution, and exposing under ultraviolet (UV) light. After the water immersion test, the filtration efficiency of meltblown mask was decreased to about 79%, while the nanofiber membrane was maintained at 99%. The same phenomenon could be observed after the 75% alcohol treatment, a high filtration efficiency of 99% was maintained in nanofiber membrane, but obvious negative effect was observed in meltblown mask, which decreased to about 50%. In addition, after long-term expose under UV light, no filtration efficiency decrease was observed in nanofiber membrane, which provide a suitable way to disinfect the potential carried virus. This work successfully achieved the daily disinfection and reuse of masks, which effectively alleviate the shortage of masks during this special period.

Keywords: Filtration efficiency; Meltblown fabrics; Nano cobweb-biomimetic membrane; Reusable mask.
 
Sounds good, but how wearable is the nanofiber mask? It has to let water vapor escape and also allow for easy air intake, otherwise it is very uncomfortable to wear.
 
Back
Top Bottom