• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Child Abuse Negl . Child safety, protection, and safeguarding in the time of COVID-19 in Great Britain: Proposing a conceptual framework

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Child Abuse Negl


. 2020 Aug 13;104668.
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104668. Online ahead of print.
Child safety, protection, and safeguarding in the time of COVID-19 in Great Britain: Proposing a conceptual framework


Diane Thembekile Levine[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Julie Morton[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michelle O'Reilly[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Great Britain has the highest coronavirus death rate in Europe. While the pandemic clearly poses a risk to the lives and wellbeing of vulnerable groups, necessary public health measures taken to delay or limit the spread of the virus have led to distinctive challenges for prevention, family support, court processes, placement and alternative care. The pandemic has also come about at a time when statutory changes to partnerships have led to a reduction in the importance of educational professional representation in the new formulation in England and Wales.
Objectives: In this discussion paper, we propose a novel and pragmatic conceptual framework during this challenging time.
Participants: We consulted with 8 education professionals and 4 field-based student social workers.
Setting: Bodies responsible for safeguarding have been working quickly to develop new approaches to fulfilling their responsibilities, for example through online home visits and case conferences. However, some communities have been highlighted as experiencing particular challenges because of the pandemic and its impacts. Protection of vulnerable children is increasingly dependent on individualised - and often pathologising - practice with a lack of emphasis on the importance of the social. Holistic consideration of the child is side-lined.
Results: Our framework comprises two phases: pandemic and aspirational.
Conclusion: The framework illuminates the importance of interconnected sectors and multi-agency working, the need for resilient and adaptable support systems, and the need to promote the importance of children's rights and voices to be heard above the noise of the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Child; Digital; Education; Framework; Safeguarding; Social care.
 
Back
Top Bottom