Re: CDC: Excerpts from Public Health Law News
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
________________________________________________________________________
From the Public Health Law Program, Office of Strategy and Innovation, CDC
http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/
*** Columbia University Report on Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. The Center for Health Policy at Columbia University prepared a gap analysis comparing the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) with existing state and local public health emergency preparedness laws. To read the gap analysis, visit http://www.nursing.columbia.edu/chphsr/projects/law/pdf/MSEHPAGapAnalysisTableBMM05-05-08.doc
*** Dismissal of School Children in the Context of Pandemic Influenza. In response to national pandemic preparedness priorities, CDC commissioned the independent Centers for Law and the Public?s Health: A Collaborative at Johns Hopkins and Georgetown Universities to review the state-level legal framework for reducing the density of school classrooms, with specific focus on closure of schools as a social distancing or social mitigation measure to slow the spread of an H5N1 influenza pandemic or similar highly contagious infectious disease. For more information on the Centers? report, Legal Preparedness for School Closures in Response to Pandemic Influenza and Other Emergencies, see http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/.
*** Online National Resource Center for Emergency Preparedness. The Center for Health Equality at Drexel University?s School of Public Health and the Office of Minority Health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have launched an online resource for advancing emergency preparedness in culturally diverse communities. The center is an ?online clearinghouse and information exchange portal? featuring hundreds of annotated references in over forty languages. To visit the center or submit a recommended resource, visit http://www.diversitypreparedness.org/
?As outbreak affects 1,000, experts see flaws in law?
The New York Times (07/10/2008) Bina Venkataraman
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/health/policy/10tomato.html
Food safety experts are calling for a closer look at the recordkeeping provisions of the Bioterrorism Act of 2002 amid the nation?s largest food-borne outbreak in the last decade. A Food and Drug Administration rule under the Act requires importers, processors, and distributors to track the supply chain of produce, and was intended to give federal officials a way to immediately respond to threats to the nation?s food supply. But more than 1,000 people in 41 states and the District of Columbia have taken ill from Salmonella Saintpaul, and the source of the contamination is still undetermined. Processors of foods suspected in the outbreak, such as tomatoes, often repack boxes to meet buyers? demands; they are not required to record the farm, state, or country of origin when doing so. ?The purpose of the recordkeeping provision of the Bioterrorism Act was to support going back to the origin of food after people have gotten sick when you are trying to find out how the biological agent got there. But the provisions are of little or no value with respect to trace-backs of fresh produce because of the amount of shoe leather and time it would take,? said Michael Taylor, a George Washington University professor and former FDA official. The rule only requires food handlers to track produce one step forward and one step back in the supply chain, but does not specify a standard format for records, further complicating trace efforts.
[Editor?s note: For more information on the current Salmonella Saintpaul investigation, visit http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/saintpaul/.]
?Rethinking volunteer management using a centralized volunteer staging and training area?
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (06/08) Eric Aakko and others
http://www.dmphp.org/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/127 (subscription required)
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
________________________________________________________________________
From the Public Health Law Program, Office of Strategy and Innovation, CDC
http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/
*** Columbia University Report on Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. The Center for Health Policy at Columbia University prepared a gap analysis comparing the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) with existing state and local public health emergency preparedness laws. To read the gap analysis, visit http://www.nursing.columbia.edu/chphsr/projects/law/pdf/MSEHPAGapAnalysisTableBMM05-05-08.doc
*** Dismissal of School Children in the Context of Pandemic Influenza. In response to national pandemic preparedness priorities, CDC commissioned the independent Centers for Law and the Public?s Health: A Collaborative at Johns Hopkins and Georgetown Universities to review the state-level legal framework for reducing the density of school classrooms, with specific focus on closure of schools as a social distancing or social mitigation measure to slow the spread of an H5N1 influenza pandemic or similar highly contagious infectious disease. For more information on the Centers? report, Legal Preparedness for School Closures in Response to Pandemic Influenza and Other Emergencies, see http://www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/.
*** Online National Resource Center for Emergency Preparedness. The Center for Health Equality at Drexel University?s School of Public Health and the Office of Minority Health at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have launched an online resource for advancing emergency preparedness in culturally diverse communities. The center is an ?online clearinghouse and information exchange portal? featuring hundreds of annotated references in over forty languages. To visit the center or submit a recommended resource, visit http://www.diversitypreparedness.org/
?As outbreak affects 1,000, experts see flaws in law?
The New York Times (07/10/2008) Bina Venkataraman
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/health/policy/10tomato.html
Food safety experts are calling for a closer look at the recordkeeping provisions of the Bioterrorism Act of 2002 amid the nation?s largest food-borne outbreak in the last decade. A Food and Drug Administration rule under the Act requires importers, processors, and distributors to track the supply chain of produce, and was intended to give federal officials a way to immediately respond to threats to the nation?s food supply. But more than 1,000 people in 41 states and the District of Columbia have taken ill from Salmonella Saintpaul, and the source of the contamination is still undetermined. Processors of foods suspected in the outbreak, such as tomatoes, often repack boxes to meet buyers? demands; they are not required to record the farm, state, or country of origin when doing so. ?The purpose of the recordkeeping provision of the Bioterrorism Act was to support going back to the origin of food after people have gotten sick when you are trying to find out how the biological agent got there. But the provisions are of little or no value with respect to trace-backs of fresh produce because of the amount of shoe leather and time it would take,? said Michael Taylor, a George Washington University professor and former FDA official. The rule only requires food handlers to track produce one step forward and one step back in the supply chain, but does not specify a standard format for records, further complicating trace efforts.
[Editor?s note: For more information on the current Salmonella Saintpaul investigation, visit http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/saintpaul/.]
?Rethinking volunteer management using a centralized volunteer staging and training area?
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (06/08) Eric Aakko and others
http://www.dmphp.org/cgi/content/abstract/2/2/127 (subscription required)