tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Cancer
. 2020 Dec 3.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33366. Online ahead of print.
Triage process for the assessment of coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients with cancer: The ONCOVID prospective study
Alice Indini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Monica Cattaneo[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Michele Ghidini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Erika Rijavec[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Claudia Bareggi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Barbara Galassi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Donatella Gambini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rosalia Ceriani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ferruccio Ceriotti[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Emilio Berti[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Francesco Grossi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Patients with cancer are considered at high risk for the novel respiratory illness coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). General measures to keep COVID-19-free cancer divisions have been adopted worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triage to identify COVID-19 among patients with cancer.
Methods: From March 20 to April 17, 2020, data were collected from patients who were treated or followed at the authors' institution in a prospective clinical trial. The primary endpoint was to estimate the cumulative incidence of COVID-19-positive patients who were identified using a triage process through the aid of medical and patient questionnaires. Based on a diagnostic algorithm, patients with suspect symptoms underwent an infectious disease specialist's evaluation and a COVID-19 swab. Serologic tests were proposed for patients who had symptoms or altered laboratory tests that did not fall into the diagnostic algorithm but were suspicious for COVID-19.
Results: Overall, 562 patients were enrolled. Six patients (1%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 4 (67%) had the disease detected through telehealth triage, and 2 patients (33%) without suspect symptoms at triage had the disease detected later. Seventy-one patients (13%) had suspect symptoms and/or altered laboratory tests that were not included in the diagnostic algorithm and, of these, 47 patients (73%) underwent testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody: 6 (13%) were positive for IgG (n = 5) or for both IgM and IgG (n = 1), and antibody tests were negative in the remaining 41 patients.
Conclusions: The triage process had a positive effect on the detection of COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Telehealth triage was helpful in detecting suspect patients and to keep a COVID-19-free cancer center. The overall incidence of COVID-19 diagnosis (1%) and antibody positivity (13%) in patients with suspect symptoms was similar to that observed in the general population.
Keywords: COVID-19 antibody; COVID-19 infection; coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); triage.
. 2020 Dec 3.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33366. Online ahead of print.
Triage process for the assessment of coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients with cancer: The ONCOVID prospective study
Alice Indini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Monica Cattaneo[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Michele Ghidini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Erika Rijavec[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Claudia Bareggi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Barbara Galassi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Donatella Gambini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rosalia Ceriani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ferruccio Ceriotti[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Emilio Berti[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Francesco Grossi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33270908
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33366
Abstract
Background: Patients with cancer are considered at high risk for the novel respiratory illness coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). General measures to keep COVID-19-free cancer divisions have been adopted worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triage to identify COVID-19 among patients with cancer.
Methods: From March 20 to April 17, 2020, data were collected from patients who were treated or followed at the authors' institution in a prospective clinical trial. The primary endpoint was to estimate the cumulative incidence of COVID-19-positive patients who were identified using a triage process through the aid of medical and patient questionnaires. Based on a diagnostic algorithm, patients with suspect symptoms underwent an infectious disease specialist's evaluation and a COVID-19 swab. Serologic tests were proposed for patients who had symptoms or altered laboratory tests that did not fall into the diagnostic algorithm but were suspicious for COVID-19.
Results: Overall, 562 patients were enrolled. Six patients (1%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 4 (67%) had the disease detected through telehealth triage, and 2 patients (33%) without suspect symptoms at triage had the disease detected later. Seventy-one patients (13%) had suspect symptoms and/or altered laboratory tests that were not included in the diagnostic algorithm and, of these, 47 patients (73%) underwent testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody: 6 (13%) were positive for IgG (n = 5) or for both IgM and IgG (n = 1), and antibody tests were negative in the remaining 41 patients.
Conclusions: The triage process had a positive effect on the detection of COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Telehealth triage was helpful in detecting suspect patients and to keep a COVID-19-free cancer center. The overall incidence of COVID-19 diagnosis (1%) and antibody positivity (13%) in patients with suspect symptoms was similar to that observed in the general population.
Keywords: COVID-19 antibody; COVID-19 infection; coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); triage.