tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Can Commun Dis Rep
. 2023 Feb 1;49(2-3):44-49.
Utility of the Peterborough Public Health COVID-19 rapid antigen test self-report tool: Implications for COVID-19 surveillance
Erin Smith[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Carolyn Pigeau[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jamal Ahmadian-Yazdi[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Mohamed Kharbouch[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jane Hoffmeyer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Thomas Piggott[SUP] 1 2 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated novel testing strategies, including the use of rapid antigen tests (RATs). The widespread distribution of RATs to the public prompted Peterborough Public Health to launch a pilot RAT self-report tool to assess its utility in COVID-19 surveillance. The objective of this study is to investigate the utility of RAT using correlations between RAT self-report results and other indicators of COVID-19.
Methods: We investigated the association between RAT results, PCR test results and wastewater levels of nmN1N2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genes (to infer COVID-19 levels) using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Percent positivity and count of positive tests for RATs and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were analyzed.
Results: The PCR percent positivity and wastewater were weakly correlated (r=0.33, p=0.022), as were RAT percent positivity and wastewater nmN1N2 levels (r=0.33, p=0.002). The RAT percent positivity and PCR percent positivity were not significantly correlated (r=-0.035, p=0.75). Count of positive RATs and count of positive PCR tests were moderately correlated (r=0.59, p<0.001). Wastewater nmN1N2 levels were not significantly correlated with either count of positive RATs (r=0.019, p=0.864) or count of positive PCR tests (r=0.004, p=0.971).
Conclusion: Our results support the use of RAT self-reporting as a low-cost simple adjunctive COVID-19 surveillance tool, and suggest that its utility is greatest when considering an absolute count of positive RATs rather than percent positivity due to reporting bias towards positive tests. These results can help inform COVID-19 surveillance strategies of local public health units and encourage the use of a RAT self-report tool.
Keywords: COVID-19; PCR test; Peterborough Public Health; evaluation; rapid antigen test; surveillance; wastewater.
. 2023 Feb 1;49(2-3):44-49.
Utility of the Peterborough Public Health COVID-19 rapid antigen test self-report tool: Implications for COVID-19 surveillance
Erin Smith[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Carolyn Pigeau[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jamal Ahmadian-Yazdi[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Mohamed Kharbouch[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jane Hoffmeyer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Thomas Piggott[SUP] 1 2 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38090728
- PMCID: PMC10715811
Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated novel testing strategies, including the use of rapid antigen tests (RATs). The widespread distribution of RATs to the public prompted Peterborough Public Health to launch a pilot RAT self-report tool to assess its utility in COVID-19 surveillance. The objective of this study is to investigate the utility of RAT using correlations between RAT self-report results and other indicators of COVID-19.
Methods: We investigated the association between RAT results, PCR test results and wastewater levels of nmN1N2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genes (to infer COVID-19 levels) using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Percent positivity and count of positive tests for RATs and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were analyzed.
Results: The PCR percent positivity and wastewater were weakly correlated (r=0.33, p=0.022), as were RAT percent positivity and wastewater nmN1N2 levels (r=0.33, p=0.002). The RAT percent positivity and PCR percent positivity were not significantly correlated (r=-0.035, p=0.75). Count of positive RATs and count of positive PCR tests were moderately correlated (r=0.59, p<0.001). Wastewater nmN1N2 levels were not significantly correlated with either count of positive RATs (r=0.019, p=0.864) or count of positive PCR tests (r=0.004, p=0.971).
Conclusion: Our results support the use of RAT self-reporting as a low-cost simple adjunctive COVID-19 surveillance tool, and suggest that its utility is greatest when considering an absolute count of positive RATs rather than percent positivity due to reporting bias towards positive tests. These results can help inform COVID-19 surveillance strategies of local public health units and encourage the use of a RAT self-report tool.
Keywords: COVID-19; PCR test; Peterborough Public Health; evaluation; rapid antigen test; surveillance; wastewater.