• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Branswell: Scientists fear row over bird flu studies may undermine credibility of the field

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
TORONTO - As influenza scientists and biosecurity experts continue to do battle over controversial bird flu studies, some in the flu world worry arguments being used to push for full publication of the studies may be eroding the credibility of the field.

This concern is not about whether the studies, which show how H5N1 flu viruses can be made to transmit easily among mammals (in this case ferrets), should be published. Many ? though not all ? flu scientists believe the papers should be published in full to further study of a virus that has alarmed them for years.

But some are uneasy about the way a number of proponents of publication are pursuing that end, at times taking positions that contradict long-held claims flu researchers have made about the importance of H5N1 work. Central to that concern is the assertion being made by a small group of flu scientists that the virus isn't as deadly as people have been led to believe ? an argument critics see as a double-edged sword.

..

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/ar...rmine-credibility-of-the-field-142072313.html
 
Back
Top Bottom