• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Br J Nurs . Impact of prolonged PPE use on Canadian health professionals

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Br J Nurs


. 2022 Aug 11;31(15):S30-S36.
doi: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.15.S30.
Impact of prolonged PPE use on Canadian health professionals


Kimberley LeBlanc[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kevin Woo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lorne Wiesenfeld[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Julia Bresnai-Harris[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Corey Heerschap[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Britney Butt[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Valérie Chaplain[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Samantha Wiesenfeld[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Aim: To explore the impact that prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE) has on the skin integrity of Canadian health professionals.
Method: A descriptive, pan-Canadian, cross-sectional, online survey was carried out to explore the type and prevalence of PPE-related skin injury among Canadian health professionals. Convenience sampling was used to disseminate the online survey link to health professionals.
Results: There were responses from 757 health professionals. Masks worn included surgical masks (90%), a combination of surgical or N95/KN95 masks (7.7%) and an N95/KN95 mask alone (2.7%). Responses showed 84.6% of providers always wear a mask while at work with 38.5% wearing the same mask all shift; 90% of participants wore protective eye wear. Complications included soreness or pressure injuries behind the ears (70%), new or worsening acne (52%), a runny nose or sneezing (45%), itching (39%), and dry skin (37%). Hand issues included dry skin (53%), red skin (30%), itching (26%), broken skin (20%), rash (16%), and dermatitis (11%) - 51% of respondents did not moisturise their hands. Complications related to gown use included itching (6%), moisture-associated skin damage (5.5%), feeling claustrophobic (4.5%), and new or worsening acne (3%). Increased perspiration due to PPE was experienced in 87.5% of respondents. Some 43% of respondents noted their mental health became worse due to wearing PPE for prolonged periods.
Conclusion: These findings should be used in the development of guidelines to prevent and manage PPE-related skin injuries among health professionals. Education for professionals should focus on skin protection, prevention of PPE-related skin complications and support for mental health issues.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Dermatitis; Device-related pressure injury; Personal protective equipment; Skin damage.
 
Back
Top Bottom