• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BP Releases Report on Causes of Gulf of Mexico Tragedy

Pathfinder

Editor, Senior Moderator
BP Releases Report on Causes of Gulf of Mexico Tragedy

Release date: 08 September 2010

No single factor caused the Macondo well tragedy. Rather, a sequence of failures involving a number of different parties led to the explosion and fire which killed 11 people and caused widespread pollution in the Gulf of Mexico earlier this year.

A report released by BP today concludes that decisions made by ?multiple companies and work teams? contributed to the accident which it says arose from ?a complex and interlinked series of mechanical failures, human judgments, engineering design, operational implementation and team interfaces.?
<!--END:Plain Text para-->

<!-- Begin: Links. --><!-- End: Links -->


The report ? based on a four-month investigation led by Mark Bly, BP?s Head of Safety and Operations and conducted independently by a team of over 50 technical and other specialists drawn from inside BP and externally ? found that:
  • The cement and shoe track barriers ? and in particular the cement slurry that was used ? at the bottom of the Macondo well failed to contain hydrocarbons within the reservoir, as they were designed to do, and allowed gas and liquids to flow up the production casing;
  • The results of the negative pressure test were incorrectly accepted by BP and Transocean, although well integrity had not been established;
  • Over a 40-minute period, the Transocean rig crew failed to recognise and act on the influx of hydrocarbons into the well until the hydrocarbons were in the riser and rapidly flowing to the surface;
  • After the well-flow reached the rig it was routed to a mud-gas separator, causing gas to be vented directly on to the rig rather than being diverted overboard;
  • The flow of gas into the engine rooms through the ventilation system created a potential for ignition which the rig?s fire and gas system did not prevent;
  • Even after explosion and fire had disabled its crew-operated controls, the rig?s blow-out preventer on the sea-bed should have activated automatically to seal the well. But it failed to operate, probably because critical components were not working.
<!--END:Plain Text para-->
Commenting on the report, which he commissioned immediately after the Macondo explosion, BP?s outgoing chief executive Tony Hayward said: ?The investigation report provides critical new information on the causes of this terrible accident. It is evident that a series of complex events, rather than a single mistake or failure, led to the tragedy. Multiple parties, including BP, Halliburton and Transocean, were involved.

?To put it simply, there was a bad cement job and a failure of the shoe track barrier at the bottom of the well, which let hydrocarbons from the reservoir into the production casing. The negative pressure test was accepted when it should not have been, there were failures in well control procedures and in the blow-out preventer; and the rig?s fire and gas system did not prevent ignition.

?Based on the report, it would appear unlikely that the well design contributed to the incident, as the investigation found that the hydrocarbons flowed up the production casing through the bottom of the well,? Hayward said.
<!--END:Plain Text para-->

<!-- Begin: Links. --><!-- End: Links -->
BP?s incoming chief executive Bob Dudley said: ?We have said from the beginning that the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon was a shared responsibility among many entities. This report makes that conclusion even clearer, presenting a detailed analysis of the facts and recommendations for improvement both for BP and the other parties involved. We have accepted all the recommendations and are examining how best to implement them across our drilling operations worldwide.

?This was a tragic accident that resulted in the loss of 11 lives and impacted the communities and the environment along the Gulf Coast region. We deeply regret this event. We have sought throughout to step up to our responsibilities. We are determined to learn the lessons for the future and we will be undertaking a broad-scale review to further improve the safety of our operations. We will invest whatever it takes to achieve that. It will be incumbent on everyone at BP to embrace and implement the changes necessary to ensure that a tragedy like this can never happen again.?

Chairman of the Board Carl-Henric Svanberg commented: ?I believe this report will be of significant value in helping the overall understanding of how this tragedy occurred. It is of the utmost importance to the Board to ensure that BP learns from this and further enhances the safety of its operations for the future.?
<!--END:Plain Text para-->

<!-- Begin: Links. --><!-- End: Links -->
Based on its key findings, the investigation team has proposed a total of 25 recommendations designed to prevent a recurrence of such an accident. The recommendations are directed at strengthening assurance on blow-out preventers, well control, pressure-testing for well integrity, emergency systems, cement testing, rig audit and verification, and personnel competence.

The company said it expected a number of the investigation report?s findings to be considered relevant to the oil industry more generally and for some of the recommendations to be widely adopted.

BP said the report was based on information available to the investigating team. It noted that additional relevant information may be forthcoming, for example, when Halliburton?s samples of the cement used in the well are released for testing and when the rig?s blow-out preventer is fully examined now that it has been recovered from the sea-bed. There will also be additional information from the multiple ongoing US government investigations.

The investigation report is available online at www.bp.com, together with an accompanying video.

http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&contentId=7064893
 
Re: BP Releases Report on Causes of Gulf of Mexico Tragedy

Multiple companies, teams contributed to spill, says BP report

61110-rig.jpg

Multiple companies, teams contributed to spill, says BP report

by Harry Weber, Michael Kunzelman and Dina Cappiello / Associated Press

wwltv.com
Posted on September 8, 2010 at 6:33 AM
Updated today at 7:46 AM


Excerpt:

...In its 193-page report posted on its website Wednesday, the British company describes the incident as an accident that arose from a complex and interlinked series of mechanical failures, human judgments, engineering design, operational implementation and team interfaces.

BP spread the blame around, and even was critical of its own workers' conduct, but it defended the design of its well and it was careful in its assessments. It already faces hundreds of lawsuits and billions of dollars of liabilities. In public hearings, it had already tried to shift some of the blame to rig owner Transocean Ltd. and cement contractor Halliburton. BP was leasing the rig from Transocean and owned the well that blew out.

The report was generated by a BP team led by Mark Bly, BP's head of safety and operations.

BP's report is far from the final word on possible causes of the explosion, as several divisions of the U.S. government, including the Justice Department, Coast Guard and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, are also investigating.

Also, a key piece of the puzzle -- the blowout preventer that failed to stop the oil from leaking from the well off the Louisiana coast -- was raised from the water Saturday. As of Tuesday afternoon, it had not reached a NASA facility in New Orleans where government investigators planned to analyze it, so those conclusions were not be part of BP's report.

The April 20 rig explosion killed 11 workers and led to 206 million gallons of oil spewing from BP's undersea well.

Investigators know the explosion was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before igniting.

But they don't know exactly how or why the gas escaped. And they don't know why the blowout preventer didn't seal the well pipe at the sea bottom after the eruption, as it was supposed to.

The details of BP's internal report were closely guarded -- and only a short list of people saw it ahead of its release...


Full text:
http://www.wwltv.com/news/gulf-oil-...ies-teams-contributed-to-spill-102422644.html
 
Re: BP Releases Report on Causes of Gulf of Mexico Tragedy

BP Report Says Many Factors Caused Macondo Oil Spill

<cite class="byline">By Joe Carroll and Jim Polson -<script type="text/javascript">document.write(dateFormat(new Date(1283948270000),"mmm d, yyyy h:MM TT Z"));</script> Sep 8, 2010 7:17 AM CT </cite>

data

The Transocean Ltd. Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico. Source: Transocean Ltd. via Bloomberg


BP Plc faulted its own engineers for a fatal drilling disaster that triggered the largest U.S. oil spill and said rig owner Transocean Ltd. and contractor Halliburton Co. also share the blame.

BP’s internal investigation of the April 20 Deepwater Horizon rig disaster cited at least eight errors of judgment and equipment failures that allowed natural gas to erupt from the subsea Macondo well 40 miles (64 kilometers) off the Louisiana coast, killing 11 workers and eventually sinking the $365 million vessel.


snip

To contact the reporters on this story: Joe Carroll in Chicago at jcarroll8@bloomberg.net; Jim Polson in New York at jpolson@bloomberg.net.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...ve-to-share-blame-for-gulf-oil-explosion.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: BP Releases Report on Causes of Gulf of Mexico Tragedy

BP internal investigation finds 'sequence of failures' doomed oil rig, spreads blame among itself, Transocean, Halliburton

Published: Wednesday, September 08, 2010, 6:13 AM Updated: Wednesday, September 08, 2010, 7:07 AM


Excerpt:

...Bly's report boiled the disaster down to this: The cement that was supposed to line the bottom of the well and keep out hydrocarbons failed; a test of pressure in the well was misinterpreted by BP engineers and Transocean rig workers; the Transocean rig crew took 40 minutes to recognize that gas was kicking up toward the rig; they routed the gas through a goose-neck tube that fed onto the rig, rather than diverting it overboard; ventilation systems allowed gas to get in the engine rooms; and the supposedly fail-safe blowout preventer failed.

Most of these issues have come out in the course of federal investigations. But BP's assessment is much more focused on what rig workers, mostly from Transocean, did after the blowout had already begun, rather than on the decisions BP engineers and others made about the design of the well and various safety measures that are supposed to stop a blowout before it happens...


Full text:
http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/09/bp_internal_investigation_find.html
 
Re: BP Releases Report on Causes of Gulf of Mexico Tragedy

BP shifts U.S. oil spill blame onto contractors

By Tom Bergin
LONDON | Wed Sep 8, 2010 8:51am EDT

(Reuters) - BP shifted much of the blame for a rig blast that led to the United States' worst-ever oil spill onto its contractors Transocean and Halliburton.

In a report released on Wednesday, BP defended decisions that U.S. politicians have said represented cost-saving measures that contributed to the explosion on the rig in the Gulf of Mexico.

These include its much-criticized single-casing well design, its choice to use fewer centralizers when cementing the well and its decision to replace heavy drilling mud, which was keeping the well under control, with lighter water.

The report, conducted by BP's head of safety, Mark Bly, highlighted eight key failures that, in combination, led to the explosion.

Most of these factors would normally be the responsibility of either Transocean, as rig operator, or Halliburton, which cemented the well.

.../
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6871GC20100908
 
Re: BP Releases Report on Causes of Gulf of Mexico Tragedy

Regret, apology not part of BP's oil spill report

Published: Thursday, September 09, 2010, 6:10 AM Updated: Thursday, September 09, 2010, 9:43 AM

The Associated Press

NEW ORLEANS ? BP's long-awaited internal report on what it believes went wrong when a rig exploded and started the massive Gulf oil spill never mentions the words blame, regret, apology, mistake or pollution.

The word fault shows up 20 times, but only once in the same sentence as the company's name.

BP took some of the blame, acknowledging among other things that it misinterpreted a key pressure test of the well that blew out and eventually spewed 206 million gallons of oil into the Gulf. But in a possible preview of its legal strategy, it also pointed the finger ? and plenty ? at its partners on the doomed rig.

...
Much more:
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/09/regret_apology_not_part_of_bps.html
 
Back
Top