• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMJ Open . Social determinants of pertussis and influenza vaccine uptake in pregnancy: a national cohort study in England using electronic health r

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open


. 2021 Jun 21;11(6):e046545.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046545.
Social determinants of pertussis and influenza vaccine uptake in pregnancy: a national cohort study in England using electronic health records


Jemma L Walker[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Christopher T Rentsch[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Helen I McDonald[SUP] 4 3 [/SUP], JeongEun Bak[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Caroline Minassian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gayatri Amirthalingam[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Michael Edelstein[SUP] 1 3 5 [/SUP], Sara Thomas[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To examine the social determinants of influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake among pregnant women in England.
Design: Nationwide population-based cohort study.
Setting: The study used anonymised primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care data.
Participants: Pregnant women eligible for pertussis (2012-2015, n=68 090) or influenza (2010/2011-2015/2016, n=152 132) vaccination in England.
Main outcome measures: Influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake.
Results: Vaccine uptake was 67.3% for pertussis and 39.1% for influenza. Uptake of both vaccines varied by region, with the lowest uptakes in London and the North East. Lower vaccine uptake was associated with greater deprivation: almost 10% lower in the most deprived quintiles compared with the least deprived for influenza (34.5% vs 44.0%), and almost 20% lower for pertussis (57.7% vs 76.0%). Lower uptake for both vaccines was also associated with non-white ethnicity (lowest among women of black ethnicity), maternal age under 20 years and a greater number of children in the household. The associations between all social factors and vaccine uptake were broadly unchanged in fully adjusted models, suggesting the social determinants of uptake were largely independent of one another. Among 3111 women vaccinated against pertussis in their first eligible pregnancy and pregnant again, 1234 (40%) were not vaccinated in their second eligible pregnancy.
Conclusions: Targeting promotional campaigns to pregnant women who are younger, of non-white ethnicity, with more children, living in areas of greater deprivation or the London or North East regions, has potential to reduce vaccine-preventable disease among infants and pregnant women, and to reduce health inequalities. Vaccination promotion needs to be sustained across successive pregnancies. Further research is needed into whether the effectiveness of vaccine promotion strategies may vary according to social factors.

Keywords: maternal medicine; primary care; public health.
 
Back
Top Bottom