tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open
. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):e085950.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085950. Qualitative evaluation of the Rehabilitation Exercise and psycholoGical support After COVID-19 InfectioN (REGAIN) randomised controlled trial (RCT): 'you are not alone'
Kate Seers[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vivien P Nichols[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Julie Bruce[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Stuart Ennis[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Peter Heine[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Shilpa Patel[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Harbinder Kaur Sandhu[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Martin Underwood[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Gordon McGregor[SUP] 10 [/SUP]; our REGAIN collaborators.; REGAIN collaborators.
Collaborators, Affiliations
Background: This qualitative evaluation was embedded in the Rehabilitation Exercise and psycholoGical support After COVID-19 InfectioN (REGAIN) study, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) for those with post-COVID-19 condition ('long COVID') after hospital admission for COVID-19, comparing weekly home-based, live online supervised group exercise and psychological support sessions with 'best practice usual care' (a single session of advice).
Objective: To increase our understanding of how and why the REGAIN programme might have worked and what helped or hindered this intervention.
Design: A qualitative evaluation which utilised interviews with participants and practitioners delivering the intervention. Framework and thematic analysis were used to analyse the findings.
Setting: England and Wales, UK.
Participants: Adults discharged from National Health Service (NHS) hospitals at least 3 months previously after COVID-19, with ongoing physical and/or mental health sequelae.
Results: Twenty intervention participants, 20 control participants and five practitioners were interviewed.The themes from the group support sessions were: (1) you are not alone; (2) sharing experiences and addressing worries; (3) gaining new perspectives; (4) hope for progression; (5) peer support and bonding; (6) integration of facilitation skills; (7) modified activity pacing and goal setting, and (8) giving participants structure. The themes from group exercise were: (1) monitoring and modification of the online exercise; (2) catering for differing abilities; (3) feeling safe and confident to exercise; (4) progression of fitness; (5) optimal timing in the recovery trajectory; (6) group effect; (7) initial apprehension about exercise group; (8) gauging exercise capabilities; (9) translating exercises into life; and (10) on-demand supplementary videos. The 1:1 consultation sessions revealed patients needed to tell their stories.
Conclusion: Being listened to and being understood by someone 'who got it' was very important to people with post-COVID-19 condition. The group sessions of both exercise and psychological support were valued by participants, working together, and learning from each other in the face of a new disease within a global pandemic.
Keywords: COVID-19; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; Qualitative Research; Rehabilitation Medicine.
. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):e085950.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085950. Qualitative evaluation of the Rehabilitation Exercise and psycholoGical support After COVID-19 InfectioN (REGAIN) randomised controlled trial (RCT): 'you are not alone'
Kate Seers[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vivien P Nichols[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Julie Bruce[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Stuart Ennis[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Peter Heine[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Shilpa Patel[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Harbinder Kaur Sandhu[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Martin Underwood[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Gordon McGregor[SUP] 10 [/SUP]; our REGAIN collaborators.; REGAIN collaborators.
Collaborators, Affiliations
- PMID: 39880461
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085950
Background: This qualitative evaluation was embedded in the Rehabilitation Exercise and psycholoGical support After COVID-19 InfectioN (REGAIN) study, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) for those with post-COVID-19 condition ('long COVID') after hospital admission for COVID-19, comparing weekly home-based, live online supervised group exercise and psychological support sessions with 'best practice usual care' (a single session of advice).
Objective: To increase our understanding of how and why the REGAIN programme might have worked and what helped or hindered this intervention.
Design: A qualitative evaluation which utilised interviews with participants and practitioners delivering the intervention. Framework and thematic analysis were used to analyse the findings.
Setting: England and Wales, UK.
Participants: Adults discharged from National Health Service (NHS) hospitals at least 3 months previously after COVID-19, with ongoing physical and/or mental health sequelae.
Results: Twenty intervention participants, 20 control participants and five practitioners were interviewed.The themes from the group support sessions were: (1) you are not alone; (2) sharing experiences and addressing worries; (3) gaining new perspectives; (4) hope for progression; (5) peer support and bonding; (6) integration of facilitation skills; (7) modified activity pacing and goal setting, and (8) giving participants structure. The themes from group exercise were: (1) monitoring and modification of the online exercise; (2) catering for differing abilities; (3) feeling safe and confident to exercise; (4) progression of fitness; (5) optimal timing in the recovery trajectory; (6) group effect; (7) initial apprehension about exercise group; (8) gauging exercise capabilities; (9) translating exercises into life; and (10) on-demand supplementary videos. The 1:1 consultation sessions revealed patients needed to tell their stories.
Conclusion: Being listened to and being understood by someone 'who got it' was very important to people with post-COVID-19 condition. The group sessions of both exercise and psychological support were valued by participants, working together, and learning from each other in the face of a new disease within a global pandemic.
Keywords: COVID-19; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; Qualitative Research; Rehabilitation Medicine.