tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open
. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e072314.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072314. Impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination strategy in Brazil: an ecological study
Soraida Aguilar[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Leonardo S L Bastos[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Paula Maçaira[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fernanda Baião[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paulo Simões[SUP] 1 [/SUP], José Cerbino-Neto[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Otavio Ranzani[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Silvio Hamacher[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fernando A Bozza[SUP] 7 4 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Objectives: No consensus exists about the best COVID-19 vaccination strategy to be adopted by low-income and middle-income countries. Brazil adopted an age-based calendar strategy to reduce mortality and the burden on the healthcare system. This study evaluates the impact of the vaccination campaign in Brazil on the progression of the reported COVID-19 deaths.
Methods: This ecological study analyses the dynamic of vaccination coverage and COVID-19 deaths in hospitalised adults (≥20 years) during the first year of the COVID-19 vaccination roll-out (January to December 2021) using nationwide data (DATASUS). We stratified the adult population into 20-49, 50-59, 60-69 and 70+ years. The dynamic effect of the vaccination campaign on mortality rates was estimated by applying a negative binomial regression. The prevented and possible preventable deaths (observed deaths higher than expected) and potential years of life lost (PYLL) for each age group were obtained in a counterfactual analysis.
Results: During the first year of COVID-19 vaccination, 266 153 517 doses were administered, achieving 91% first-dose coverage. A total of 380 594 deaths were reported, 154 091 (40%) in 70+ years and 136 804 (36%) from 50-59 or 20-49 years. The mortality rates of 70+ decreased by 52% (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.43-0.53]) in 6 months, whereas rates for 20-49 were still increasing due to low coverage (52%). The vaccination roll-out strategy prevented 59 618 deaths, 53 088 (89%) from those aged 70+ years. However, the strategy did not prevent 54 797 deaths, 85% from those under 60 years, being 26 344 (45%) only in 20-49, corresponding to 1 589 271 PYLL, being 1 080 104 PYLL (68%) from those aged 20-49 years.
Conclusion: The adopted aged-based calendar vaccination strategy initially reduced mortality in the oldest but did not prevent the deaths of the youngest as effectively as compared with the older age group. Countries with a high burden, limited vaccine supply and young populations should consider other factors beyond the age to prioritise who should be vaccinated first.
Keywords: COVID-19; EPIDEMIOLOGY; Public health.
. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e072314.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072314. Impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination strategy in Brazil: an ecological study
Soraida Aguilar[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Leonardo S L Bastos[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Paula Maçaira[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fernanda Baião[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paulo Simões[SUP] 1 [/SUP], José Cerbino-Neto[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Otavio Ranzani[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Silvio Hamacher[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fernando A Bozza[SUP] 7 4 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38964793
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072314
Objectives: No consensus exists about the best COVID-19 vaccination strategy to be adopted by low-income and middle-income countries. Brazil adopted an age-based calendar strategy to reduce mortality and the burden on the healthcare system. This study evaluates the impact of the vaccination campaign in Brazil on the progression of the reported COVID-19 deaths.
Methods: This ecological study analyses the dynamic of vaccination coverage and COVID-19 deaths in hospitalised adults (≥20 years) during the first year of the COVID-19 vaccination roll-out (January to December 2021) using nationwide data (DATASUS). We stratified the adult population into 20-49, 50-59, 60-69 and 70+ years. The dynamic effect of the vaccination campaign on mortality rates was estimated by applying a negative binomial regression. The prevented and possible preventable deaths (observed deaths higher than expected) and potential years of life lost (PYLL) for each age group were obtained in a counterfactual analysis.
Results: During the first year of COVID-19 vaccination, 266 153 517 doses were administered, achieving 91% first-dose coverage. A total of 380 594 deaths were reported, 154 091 (40%) in 70+ years and 136 804 (36%) from 50-59 or 20-49 years. The mortality rates of 70+ decreased by 52% (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.43-0.53]) in 6 months, whereas rates for 20-49 were still increasing due to low coverage (52%). The vaccination roll-out strategy prevented 59 618 deaths, 53 088 (89%) from those aged 70+ years. However, the strategy did not prevent 54 797 deaths, 85% from those under 60 years, being 26 344 (45%) only in 20-49, corresponding to 1 589 271 PYLL, being 1 080 104 PYLL (68%) from those aged 20-49 years.
Conclusion: The adopted aged-based calendar vaccination strategy initially reduced mortality in the oldest but did not prevent the deaths of the youngest as effectively as compared with the older age group. Countries with a high burden, limited vaccine supply and young populations should consider other factors beyond the age to prioritise who should be vaccinated first.
Keywords: COVID-19; EPIDEMIOLOGY; Public health.