tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open
. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e060992.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060992.
Attitudes towards coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine and sources of information across diverse ethnic groups in the UK: a qualitative study from June to October 2020
Eirwen Sides[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Leah Ffion Jones[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Atiya Kamal[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Amy Thomas[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rowshonara Syeda[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Awatif Kaissi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Donna M Lecky[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mahendra Patel[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Laura Nellums[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jane Greenway[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ines Campos-Matos[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Rashmi Shukla[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Colin S Brown[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Manish Pareek[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Loretta Sollars[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Emma Pawson[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Cliodna McNulty[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: Across diverse ethnic groups in the UK, explore attitudes and intentions towards COVID-19 vaccination and sources of COVID-19 information.
Design: Remote qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) conducted June-October 2020 before UK COVID-19 vaccine approval. Data were transcribed and analysed through inductive thematic analysis and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Setting: England and Wales.
Participants: 100 participants from 19 self-identified ethnic groups.
Results: Mistrust and doubt were reported across ethnic groups. Many participants shared concerns about perceived lack of information about COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy. There were differences within each ethnic group, with factors such as occupation and perceived health status influencing intention to accept a vaccine once made available. Across ethnic groups, participants believed that public contact occupations, older adults and vulnerable groups should be prioritised for vaccination. Perceived risk, social influences, occupation, age, comorbidities and engagement with healthcare influenced participants' intentions to accept vaccination once available. All Jewish FG participants intended to accept, while all Traveller FG participants indicated they probably would not.Facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake across ethnic groups included: desire to return to normality and protect health and well-being; perceived higher risk of infection; evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy; vaccine availability and accessibility.COVID-19 information sources were influenced by social factors and included: friends and family; media and news outlets; research literature; and culture and religion. Participants across most different ethnic groups were concerned about misinformation or had negative attitudes towards the media.
Conclusions: During vaccination rollout, including boosters, commissioners and providers should provide accurate information, authentic community outreach and use appropriate channels to disseminate information and counter misinformation. Adopting a context-specific approach to vaccine resources, interventions and policies and empowering communities has potential to increase trust in the programme.
Keywords: COVID-19; Infection control; Public health; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.
. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e060992.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060992.
Attitudes towards coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine and sources of information across diverse ethnic groups in the UK: a qualitative study from June to October 2020
Eirwen Sides[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Leah Ffion Jones[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Atiya Kamal[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Amy Thomas[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rowshonara Syeda[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Awatif Kaissi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Donna M Lecky[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mahendra Patel[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Laura Nellums[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jane Greenway[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ines Campos-Matos[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Rashmi Shukla[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Colin S Brown[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Manish Pareek[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Loretta Sollars[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Emma Pawson[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Cliodna McNulty[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36581971
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060992
Abstract
Objectives: Across diverse ethnic groups in the UK, explore attitudes and intentions towards COVID-19 vaccination and sources of COVID-19 information.
Design: Remote qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) conducted June-October 2020 before UK COVID-19 vaccine approval. Data were transcribed and analysed through inductive thematic analysis and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Setting: England and Wales.
Participants: 100 participants from 19 self-identified ethnic groups.
Results: Mistrust and doubt were reported across ethnic groups. Many participants shared concerns about perceived lack of information about COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy. There were differences within each ethnic group, with factors such as occupation and perceived health status influencing intention to accept a vaccine once made available. Across ethnic groups, participants believed that public contact occupations, older adults and vulnerable groups should be prioritised for vaccination. Perceived risk, social influences, occupation, age, comorbidities and engagement with healthcare influenced participants' intentions to accept vaccination once available. All Jewish FG participants intended to accept, while all Traveller FG participants indicated they probably would not.Facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake across ethnic groups included: desire to return to normality and protect health and well-being; perceived higher risk of infection; evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy; vaccine availability and accessibility.COVID-19 information sources were influenced by social factors and included: friends and family; media and news outlets; research literature; and culture and religion. Participants across most different ethnic groups were concerned about misinformation or had negative attitudes towards the media.
Conclusions: During vaccination rollout, including boosters, commissioners and providers should provide accurate information, authentic community outreach and use appropriate channels to disseminate information and counter misinformation. Adopting a context-specific approach to vaccine resources, interventions and policies and empowering communities has potential to increase trust in the programme.
Keywords: COVID-19; Infection control; Public health; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.