• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMJ Evid Based Med . Is there a smoker's paradox in COVID-19?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Evid Based Med


. 2020 Aug 11;bmjebm-2020-111492.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111492. Online ahead of print.
Is there a smoker's paradox in COVID-19?


Muhammad Shariq Usman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tariq Jamal Siddiqi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Muhammad Shahzeb Khan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Urvish K Patel[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Izza Shahid[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jawad Ahmed[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ankur Kalra[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Erin D Michos[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Although it is well established that cigarette smoking is associated with morbidity and mortality in several respiratory infections, data from recent studies suggest that active smokers are underrepresented among patients with COVID-19. This has led to claims that a 'smoker's paradox' may exist in COVID-19, wherein smokers are protected from infection and severe complications of COVID-19. We aimed to review and summarise existing literature in this context. Electronic databases were searched for articles that reported prevalence of smokers among patients with COVID-19 or studied any association of smoking with outcomes among patients with COVID-19. We identified several biases and knowledge gaps which may give the false impression that smoking is protective in COVID-19. As of now, the data supporting smoker's paradox claims are limited and questionable. Plausible biologic mechanisms by which smoking might be protective in COVID-19 include an anti-inflammatory effect of nicotine, a blunted immune response in smokers (reducing the risk of a cytokine storm in COVID-19) and increased nitric oxide in the respiratory tract (which may inhibit replication of SARS-CoV-2 and its entry into cells). On the other hand, smoking may worsen susceptibility and prognosis in COVID-19, in a manner similar to other respiratory infections. The claims of a protective effect must be viewed with extreme caution by both the general population as well as clinicians. Further investigations into the interaction between smoking and COVID-19 are warranted to accurately assess the risk of contracting COVID-19 among smokers, and progression to mechanical ventilation or death in patients suffering from it.

Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus disease 2019; nicotine; outcomes; smoking; tobacco.
 
Back
Top Bottom