• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Pulm Med . Long-term respiratory consequences of COVID-19 related pneumonia: a cohort study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Pulm Med


. 2023 Nov 11;23(1):439.
doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02627-w. Long-term respiratory consequences of COVID-19 related pneumonia: a cohort study

Saioa Eizaguirre[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gladis Sabater[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sònia Belda[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Juan Carlos Calderón[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Victor Pineda[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Marc Comas-Cufí[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Marc Bonnin[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ramon Orriols[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Our aims were to describe respiratory sequelae up to 12 months after discharge in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia requiring non-invasive respiratory support therapies.
Methods: This study was undertaken at University Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta (Girona, Spain) between March 2020 and June 2020. Three months after discharge, we evaluated their dyspnoea and performed Saint George's respiratory questionnaire, pulmonary function tests, blood test, 6-min walking test, and a high-resolution CT (HRCT). At the six and 12-month follow-up, we repeated all tests except for pulmonary function, 6-min walking test, and HRCT, which were performed only if abnormal findings had been previously detected.
Results: Out of the 94 patients recruited, 73% were male, the median age was 62.9 years old, and most were non-smokers (58%). When comparing data three and 12 months after discharge, the percentage of patients presenting dyspnoea ≥ 2 decreased (19% vs 7%), the quality-of-life total score improved (22.8% vs 18.9%; p = 0.019), there were less abnormal results in the pulmonary function tests (47% vs 23%), the 6-min walking test distance was enhanced (368.3 m vs 390.7 m, p = 0.020), ground glass opacities findings waned (51.6% vs 11.5%), and traction bronchiectasis increased (5.6% vs 15.9%). Only age showed significant differences between patients with and without pulmonary fibrotic-like changes.
Conclusion: Most patients improved their clinical condition, pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life one year after discharge. Nonetheless, pulmonary fibrotic-like changes were observed during the follow-ups.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus disease; Long-term sequelae; Pneumonia; Pulmonary fibrosis.

 
Back
Top Bottom