• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Pulm Med . A comparison of pulmonary function pre and post mild SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthy adults

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Pulm Med


. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):163.
doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03613-0. A comparison of pulmonary function pre and post mild SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthy adults

Raz Roje Taib[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yuval Kozlov[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Aya Ekshtein[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Barak Gordon[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Ori Wand[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Oded Ben-Ari[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection frequently involves the respiratory system and may impact on pulmonary function tests (PFT) of recovered individuals. Studies which compare post-COVID-19 PFT to pre-illness measurements are scarce. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of COVID-19 on PFT soon after infection.
Methods: In this prospective observational study, PFT were measured early following recovery from COVID-19 among healthy military aircrew. Spirometry values were compared to pre-COVID-19 measurements, and abnormality rates of lung volumes and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed.
Results: The study included 252 aviators, 97.6% males, mean age 34.9-years, following recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants manifested mild symptoms (79.4%) or were asymptomatic (20.6%). Post-COVID-19 spirometry results 10.79 ± 5.67 days following infection were compared to measurements performed 41.3 ± 28.59 months earlier. Pre- and post-COVID-19 results were comparable, with similar minimal abnormalities rates (2% and 4.4%, respectively). In addition, there were no restrictive abnormalities following infection, and just 7.7% of individuals had a marginally low DLCO of 70-80% of predicted.
Conclusion: Among vaccinated, healthy adults, mild COVID-19 had no significant impact on PFT early post-infection. The data suggest that systematic PFT testing might not be necessary for asymptomatic healthy individuals who recovered from mild COVID-19.

Keywords: Aviation medicine; COVID-19; Coronavirus disease; Pulmonary function test; Reduced oxygen breathing device; SARS-CoV-2.

 
Back
Top Bottom