• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Public Health . Results of the Cologne Corona surveillance (CoCoS) study - a prospective population-based cohort study: incidence data and pote

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Public Health


. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):1379.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13745-1.
Results of the Cologne Corona surveillance (CoCoS) study - a prospective population-based cohort study: incidence data and potential underestimation of new SARS-CoV-2 adult infections by health authorities


Max Oberste[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lynn-Marie Pusch[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rebecca Roth[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kija Shah-Hosseini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jana Schmitz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Eva Heger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Felix Dewald[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Claudia Müller[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Luise Stach von Goltzheim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Clara Lehmann[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Michael Buess[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Anna Wolff[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Gerd Fätkenheuer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Gerhard Wiesmüller[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Florian Klein[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kerstin Daniela Rosenberger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Florian Neuhann[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Martin Hellmich[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Current incidence estimates of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany rely to a large extent on case notifications. However, the large number of mild or asymptomatic infections is likely to result in underestimation. Population-based studies can provide valid estimates of the SARS-CoV-2 incidence and thus support health authorities to monitor the epidemiological situation and to initiate, maintain, strengthen or relax effective countermeasures.
Methods: This study was conducted in Cologne, Germany. Six-thousand randomly drawn Cologne residents, 18 years of age or older, were contacted by mail in March 2021. Study envelopes contained a kit for self-administered saliva sample and access details to a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, previous positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR and completed COVID-19 vaccinations. Participants were again invited for a second round in June 2021, while those who declined participation were replaced by additional randomly drawn Cologne residents in order to reach a total of 6000 potential participants again. The saliva samples were sent to the laboratory by mail and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-qPCR. The incidence estimates were adjusted for sensitivity and specificity of the test procedure and compared with the official numbers of new SARS-CoV-2 cases in the adult Cologne population.
Results: The first surveillance round in March 2021 (response rate: 34.08%, N = 2045) showed a SARS-CoV-2 seven-day incidence of 85 cases per 100,000 adult Cologne residents (95% CI: 9 to 319). In the same period, the officially registered cases were 125 per 100,000. The second surveillance round in June 2021 (response rate: 36.53%, N = 2192) showed a seven-day incidence of 27 per 100,000 adult Cologne residents (95% CI: 1 to 142), while the official figures for newly registered SARS-CoV-2 cases in the same period were 15 per 100,000.
Conclusions: The incidence estimates do not indicate relevant underestimation of new SARS-CoV-2 infections based on case notification. Regular use of the surveillance method developed here may nevertheless complement the efforts of the health authorities to assess the epidemiological situation.
Trial registration: DRKS.de, German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), Identifier: DRKS00024046 , Registered on 25 February 2021.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Incidence; Pandemic; Surveillance; Underestimation.
 
Back
Top Bottom