tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Public Health
. 2022 May 25;22(1):1049.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13412-5.
Influenza vaccination coverage of professionals working in nursing homes in France and related determinants, 2018-2019 season: a cross-sectional survey
Sophie Vaux[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laure Fonteneau[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anne-Gaëlle Venier[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Arnaud Gautier[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sophan Soing Altrach[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pierre Parneix[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Daniel Lévy-Bruhl[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: The burden of influenza morbidity and mortality in nursing homes (NH) is high. Vaccination of residents and professionals working in NH is the main prevention strategy. Despite recommendations, vaccination coverage among professionals is generally low.
Methods: We performed a nationwide cross-sectional survey of NH using a single-stage stratified random sampling design to estimate influenza vaccination coverage in NH healthcare workers (HCW) and non-medical professionals in France during the 2018-2019 season, and to identify measures likely to increase it. For each NH, a questionnaire was completed with aggregated data by one member of the management team. A multivariate analysis was performed using a negative binomial regression.
Results: Five-hundred and eighty nine NH filled in the study questionnaire (response rate: 49.5%). When considering all professionals (i.e., HCW and non-medical professionals), overall vaccination coverage was 30.6% (95%CI [28.2-33.0], range: 1.6-96.2). Overall influenza vaccination coverage in HCW was 31.9% [29.7-34.1]. It varied according to occupational category: 75.5% [69.3-81.7] for physicians, 42.9% [39.4-46.4] for nurses, 26.7% [24.5-29.0] for nursing assistants, and 34.0% [30.1-38.0] for other paramedical personnel. Vaccination coverage was higher i) in private nursing homes (RRa: 1.3, [1.1-1.5]), ii) in small nursing homes (0.9 [0.8-0.9]), iii) when vaccination was offered free of charge (1.4, [1.1-1.8]), iv) when vaccination promotion for professionals included individual (1.6 [1.1-2.1]) or collective (1.3 [1.1-1.5]) information sessions, videos or games (1.4 [1.2-1.6], v) when information on influenza vaccines was provided (1.2 [1.0-1.3], and finally, vi) when a vaccination point of contact-defined as an HCW who could provide reliable information on vaccination-was nominated within the nursing home (1.7 [1.3-2.2]).
Conclusions: Urgent and innovative actions are required to increase coverage in HCW. Vaccination programmes should include free on-site vaccination and education campaigns, and particularly target nursing assistants. The results of this nationwide study provide keys for improving influenza vaccination coverage in HCW. Programmes should ensure that information on influenza vaccines is provided by a vaccination point of contact in NH using attractive media. Combining the different prevention measures proposed could increase coverage in NH nationwide by over 50%.
Keywords: Healthcare workers; Influenza; Nursing homes; Vaccination; Vaccine coverage.
. 2022 May 25;22(1):1049.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13412-5.
Influenza vaccination coverage of professionals working in nursing homes in France and related determinants, 2018-2019 season: a cross-sectional survey
Sophie Vaux[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laure Fonteneau[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anne-Gaëlle Venier[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Arnaud Gautier[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sophan Soing Altrach[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pierre Parneix[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Daniel Lévy-Bruhl[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35614428
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13412-5
Abstract
Background: The burden of influenza morbidity and mortality in nursing homes (NH) is high. Vaccination of residents and professionals working in NH is the main prevention strategy. Despite recommendations, vaccination coverage among professionals is generally low.
Methods: We performed a nationwide cross-sectional survey of NH using a single-stage stratified random sampling design to estimate influenza vaccination coverage in NH healthcare workers (HCW) and non-medical professionals in France during the 2018-2019 season, and to identify measures likely to increase it. For each NH, a questionnaire was completed with aggregated data by one member of the management team. A multivariate analysis was performed using a negative binomial regression.
Results: Five-hundred and eighty nine NH filled in the study questionnaire (response rate: 49.5%). When considering all professionals (i.e., HCW and non-medical professionals), overall vaccination coverage was 30.6% (95%CI [28.2-33.0], range: 1.6-96.2). Overall influenza vaccination coverage in HCW was 31.9% [29.7-34.1]. It varied according to occupational category: 75.5% [69.3-81.7] for physicians, 42.9% [39.4-46.4] for nurses, 26.7% [24.5-29.0] for nursing assistants, and 34.0% [30.1-38.0] for other paramedical personnel. Vaccination coverage was higher i) in private nursing homes (RRa: 1.3, [1.1-1.5]), ii) in small nursing homes (0.9 [0.8-0.9]), iii) when vaccination was offered free of charge (1.4, [1.1-1.8]), iv) when vaccination promotion for professionals included individual (1.6 [1.1-2.1]) or collective (1.3 [1.1-1.5]) information sessions, videos or games (1.4 [1.2-1.6], v) when information on influenza vaccines was provided (1.2 [1.0-1.3], and finally, vi) when a vaccination point of contact-defined as an HCW who could provide reliable information on vaccination-was nominated within the nursing home (1.7 [1.3-2.2]).
Conclusions: Urgent and innovative actions are required to increase coverage in HCW. Vaccination programmes should include free on-site vaccination and education campaigns, and particularly target nursing assistants. The results of this nationwide study provide keys for improving influenza vaccination coverage in HCW. Programmes should ensure that information on influenza vaccines is provided by a vaccination point of contact in NH using attractive media. Combining the different prevention measures proposed could increase coverage in NH nationwide by over 50%.
Keywords: Healthcare workers; Influenza; Nursing homes; Vaccination; Vaccine coverage.