• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Prim Care . 2024 Dec 5;25(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02665-1. When clinicians and patients disagree on vaccination: what primary care clini

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Prim Care


. 2024 Dec 5;25(1):412.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02665-1. When clinicians and patients disagree on vaccination: what primary care clinicians can learn from COVID-19-vaccine-hesitant patients about communication, trust, and relationships in healthcare

Natalie Purcell[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Hajra Usman[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Nicole Woodruff[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Haley Mehlman[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Leah Tobey-Moore[SUP] 8 9 10 [/SUP], Beth Ann Petrakis[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Karen Anderson Oliver[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Adam Kaplan[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Jeffrey M Pyne[SUP] 8 9 [/SUP], Jennifer K Manuel[SUP] 4 13 [/SUP], Beth M DeRonne[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Dan Bertenthal[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Karen H Seal[SUP] 4 13 14 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: In the United States, discourse on COVID-19 vaccination has become polarized, and the positions of public health officials are met with skepticism by many vaccine-hesitant Americans. This polarization may impact future vaccination efforts as well as clinician-patient relationships.
Methods: We interviewed 77 vaccine-hesitant patients and 41 clinicians about COVID-19 vaccination communication in primary care as part of a Veterans Affairs (VA) trial evaluating a vaccine-communication intervention. This paper reports the findings of a qualitative analysis focused on one aspect of those interviews-the disconnect between primary care clinicians' and patients' perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination communication and decision-making.
Results: Rapid qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews revealed fundamental differences in how clinicians and patients understood and described the reasoning, values, and concerns underlying COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. These differences were significant and value-laden; they included negative judgments that could undermine communication between clinicians and patients and, over time, erode trust and empathy.
Conclusion: We advocate for empathic listening and suggest communication strategies to bridge the divide between clinicians and vaccine-hesitant patients.

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccination; Healthcare communication; Healthcare relationships; Motivational interviewing; Trust; Vaccine hesitancy.

 
Back
Top Bottom