tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):771.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04248-9.
An evaluation of strategies to achieve greater than 90% coverage of maternal influenza and pertussis vaccines including an economic evaluation
Michelle L Giles[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kong Khai[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Sushena Krishnaswamy[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Karen Bellamy[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Margaret Angliss[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Christopher Smith[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Olivia Fay[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Paul Paddle[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Beverley Vollenhoven[SUP] 3 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Maternal immunisation is an essential public health intervention aimed at improving the health outcomes for pregnant women and providing protection to the newborn. Despite international recommendations, safety and efficacy data for the intervention, and often a fully funded program, uptake of vaccines in pregnancy remain suboptimal. One possible explanation for this includes limited access to vaccination services at the point of antenatal care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in vaccine coverage among pregnant women following implementation of a modified model of delivery aimed at improving access at the point of antenatal care, including an economic evaluation.
Methods: This prospective multi-centre study, using action research design, across six maternity services in Victoria, Australia, evaluated the implementation of a co-designed vaccine delivery model (either a pharmacy led model, midwife led model or primary care led model) supported by provider education. The main outcome measure was influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake during pregnancy and the incremental cost of the new model (compared to existing models) and the cost-effectiveness of the new model at each participating health service.
Results: Influenza vaccine coverage in 2019 increased between 50 and 196% from baseline. All services reduced their average cost per immunisation under the new platforms due to efficiencies achieved in the delivery of maternal immunisations. This cost saving ranged from $9 to $71.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that there is no 'one size fits all' model of vaccine delivery. Future successful strategies to improve maternal vaccine coverage at other maternity services should be site specific, multifaceted, targeted at the existing barriers to maternal vaccine uptake, and heavily involve local stakeholders in the design and implementation of these strategies. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that an increase in maternal influenza immunisation uptake can be achieved at a relatively modest cost through amendment of maternal immunisation platforms.
Keywords: Barriers; Immunisation; Influenza; Pertussis; Service delivery; Vaccine.
. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):771.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04248-9.
An evaluation of strategies to achieve greater than 90% coverage of maternal influenza and pertussis vaccines including an economic evaluation
Michelle L Giles[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kong Khai[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Sushena Krishnaswamy[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Karen Bellamy[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Margaret Angliss[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Christopher Smith[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Olivia Fay[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Paul Paddle[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Beverley Vollenhoven[SUP] 3 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34781905
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04248-9
Abstract
Background: Maternal immunisation is an essential public health intervention aimed at improving the health outcomes for pregnant women and providing protection to the newborn. Despite international recommendations, safety and efficacy data for the intervention, and often a fully funded program, uptake of vaccines in pregnancy remain suboptimal. One possible explanation for this includes limited access to vaccination services at the point of antenatal care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in vaccine coverage among pregnant women following implementation of a modified model of delivery aimed at improving access at the point of antenatal care, including an economic evaluation.
Methods: This prospective multi-centre study, using action research design, across six maternity services in Victoria, Australia, evaluated the implementation of a co-designed vaccine delivery model (either a pharmacy led model, midwife led model or primary care led model) supported by provider education. The main outcome measure was influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake during pregnancy and the incremental cost of the new model (compared to existing models) and the cost-effectiveness of the new model at each participating health service.
Results: Influenza vaccine coverage in 2019 increased between 50 and 196% from baseline. All services reduced their average cost per immunisation under the new platforms due to efficiencies achieved in the delivery of maternal immunisations. This cost saving ranged from $9 to $71.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that there is no 'one size fits all' model of vaccine delivery. Future successful strategies to improve maternal vaccine coverage at other maternity services should be site specific, multifaceted, targeted at the existing barriers to maternal vaccine uptake, and heavily involve local stakeholders in the design and implementation of these strategies. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that an increase in maternal influenza immunisation uptake can be achieved at a relatively modest cost through amendment of maternal immunisation platforms.
Keywords: Barriers; Immunisation; Influenza; Pertussis; Service delivery; Vaccine.