• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Infect Dis . Evaluation of physiological severity scores for predicting COVID-19 disease progression: a retrospective study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis


. 2025 May 26;25(1):758.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11127-7. Evaluation of physiological severity scores for predicting COVID-19 disease progression: a retrospective study

Sujaree Poopipatpab[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ratchaya Weerayutwattana[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pruchwilai Nuchpramool[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Piyarat Phairatwet[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tospon Lertwattanachai[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Konlawij Trongtrakul[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic indeed strains healthcare systems worldwide, resulting in a surge of patients with severe conditions. Numerous physiological severity scores have been assigned to assess critical conditions; however, a comprehensive comparison of these scoring systems remains lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of the severity scores upon admission in predicting the progression of COVID-19 patients to a severe condition within 14 days after hospitalization.
Methods: Non-critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2021, were assessed. We compared the discriminated ability of physiological severity scores in predicting disease progression to critical conditions using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: Totally, 348 non-critically ill COVID-19 patients were included. Of these, 60 patients (17.2%) progressed to severe conditions within 14 days after hospitalization. The National Early Warning Score 2 with age and body mass index (NEWS2 Plus) was the most outperformed than the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), the Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS), the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores, for predicting deterioration to severe conditions [AUC 0.77 (95% CI; 0.72-0.83)]. The NEWS2 Plus with a cutoff point of five exhibited high sensitivity (83.3%) and high negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.7%.
Conclusions: NEWS2 Plus score can enhance its utility for triage of COVID-19 patients' clinical status upon admission and guide appropriate management decisions for resource allocation.
Trial registration: TCTR20241026001, registered on 26 October 2024.

Keywords: Early determination; National Early Warning Score 2 Plus (NEWS2 Plus); Non-critically ill COVID-19; Physiological severity score.

 
Back
Top Bottom