• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Infect Dis . COVID-19 status and intensive care unit burden and mortality: a single-center retrospective cohort study comparing COVID-19 and no

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis


. 2026 Jul 18.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-026-13935-x. Online ahead of print.
COVID-19 status and intensive care unit burden and mortality: a single-center retrospective cohort study comparing COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 admissions

Mateusz Bartoszewicz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samuel Stróż[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sławomir Lech Czaban[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jerzy Robert Ładny[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sergiy Fedorov[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Andrii S Herashchenko[SUP] 4 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) placed substantial pressure on intensive care units (ICUs), but long-period comparisons with non-COVID-19 ICU patients remain useful for distinguishing disease-associated patterns from the general burden of critical illness. We addressed the gap in single-center data linking COVID-19 status with mortality, healthcare-associated infections, admission physiology, and Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) workload in a mixed tertiary ICU.
Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included first admissions to the adult ICU of the University Clinical Hospital in Białystok, Poland, between January 1, 2017, and June 1, 2023. Patients were classified as COVID-19-positive (n = 355) or COVID-19-negative (n = 2971) according to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, healthcare-associated infections, admission laboratory and arterial blood gas variables, and TISS-28 variables were compared using Welch t-tests, chi-square tests, or Fisher exact tests, as appropriate. Effect sizes are reported with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression estimated the association between COVID-19 status and in-hospital mortality in unadjusted, baseline-adjusted, and exploratory complete-case models.
Results: In-hospital mortality was higher in COVID-19-positive patients than in COVID-19-negative patients (227/355 [63.9%] vs. 1320/2971 [44.4%]; odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.79). This association remained after baseline adjustment (adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.58) and in the exploratory complete-case model including admission physiology and laboratory markers (adjusted OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.64). Among non-survivors, time to death was shorter in the COVID-19-positive group (10.7 [SD 7.4] vs. 14.3 [SD 20.0] days; mean difference - 3.63 days, 95% CI -5.07 to -2.18). Bacterial bloodstream infection was more frequent in COVID-19-positive patients (22.8% vs. 9.9%; OR 2.70, 95% CI 2.05 to 3.56). At admission, COVID-19-positive patients had lower C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, PaO2, creatinine, and lactate, but higher PaCO2, glucose, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and hemoglobin values. TISS-28 profiles differed by COVID-19 status, most notably for respiratory physiotherapy recorded at least once (97.5% vs. 62.0%; OR 23.63, 95% CI 11.76 to 47.52) and longer duration of respiratory physiotherapy (mean difference 4.89 days, 95% CI 3.57 to 6.22).
Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, COVID-19-positive status was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, shorter time to death among non-survivors, more frequent bacterial bloodstream infection, and a distinct ICU workload profile. These findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects because of the single-center design, long heterogeneous study period, incomplete severity-score data, and lack of shift-level staffing and high-dependency-unit data.

Keywords: Bloodstream infection; COVID-19; Critical care organization; Healthcare-associated infections; ICU mortality; Intensive care unit; SARS-CoV-2; TISS-28.

 
Back
Top