• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Glob Public Health . Robust estimation of the time-dependent reproduction number in the presence of weekend reporting effects

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Glob Public Health


. 2026 May 21;4(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s44263-026-00280-z.
Robust estimation of the time-dependent reproduction number in the presence of weekend reporting effects

Isaac Ogi-Gittins[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Nicholas Steyn[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alexander R Kaye[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Edward M Hill[SUP] 4 5 6 7 [/SUP], Robin N Thompson[SUP] 8 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background: During infectious disease outbreaks, changes in pathogen transmissibility are assessed through real-time inference of metrics such as the time-dependent reproduction number (R[SUB]t[/SUB]), which can be estimated from disease incidence data. However, such data are often subject to a "day-of-the-week effect" (DOWE), whereby the number of cases on certain days of the week is liable to being under-reported (due to administrative delays) or over-reported (as public health authorities "catch-up" on reporting delayed cases). For example, cases occurring at weekends may only be reported during the following week, leading to under-reporting at weekends and over-reporting on weekdays (a weekend reporting effect; WRE).
Methods: We analyse simulated datasets, as well as case reports from San Francisco recorded during the 1918 influenza pandemic. We investigate the impacts of WREs on R[SUB]t[/SUB] estimates obtained using two approaches: i) the Cori method (a frequently applied method for estimating R[SUB]t[/SUB] from daily disease incidence time series data); ii) an alternative method, involving aggregating the daily incidence data into weekly values to remove the WRE and applying a previous method (the OG1 method) for inferring R[SUB]t[/SUB] from weekly data.
Results: Our analyses indicate that R[SUB]t[/SUB] estimates obtained from standard approaches such as the Cori method can be affected negatively by WREs. In contrast, since weekly aggregation of daily data can eliminate WREs, the alternative approach generates robust R[SUB]t[/SUB] estimates in the presence of WREs. When aggregating the daily data into weekly values, some information is lost. However, in many scenarios, the negative impact of data aggregation on R[SUB]t[/SUB] inference is outweighed by the benefit of then using data that are not corrupted by a WRE.
Conclusions: Our research highlights the importance of accounting for DOWEs, such as WREs, when estimating R[SUB]t[/SUB] during infectious disease outbreaks.

Keywords: Day-of-the-week effect; Infectious disease epidemiology; Mathematical modelling; Parameter inference; Time-dependent reproduction number; Weekend reporting effect.

 
Back
Top