Shiloh
Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://mdn.mainichi.jp/perspectives/news/20081120p2a00m0na002000c.html
Bird lovers' feathers ruffled after being told not to feed migratory birds
The wild bird researcher and poet Godo Nakanishi once uttered these famous words: "Birds of the wild (should be) in the wild. Birds should be wild birds." He even coined the word "yacho" as a term to denote "wild bird." Indeed, when he founded the Wild Bird Association of Japan (Nihon Yacho no Kai) in 1934, the word "yacho" was so unfamiliar that many people read it as "nodori."
Up until that point in time, the Japanese had looked upon birds as something either to be eaten or to be put into cages. Godo urged people to "trample on their bird cages, and to go into the wild to appreciate birds in their natural state. That is what bird loving is all about." (As cited in "No no Tori wa No Ni" (Wild Birds to the Wild) by Teruyuki Kobayashi.) Today, the term "wild bird" is widely used, and Godo's bird loving philosophy, which requires that the distance of nature separate humans from birds, is widely accepted. But from time to time, questions are raised about where to draw the line between what humans should or should not do in order to protect wild birds.
This spring, after the deadly avian influenza (bird flu) virus was detected in swans in the Tohoku region, bird lovers began to refrain from their custom adhered to for many years of feeding migratory birds. Areas which until last year had been used to feed birds as a tourist attraction are now being roped off to prevent people from approaching the water.
Experts say that feeding birds encourages large flocks to congregate in particular areas, increasing the risk of infection. On the other hand, we can sympathize with the dismay of the citizens' groups that have fed birds for many years and now worry that the birds may not be getting enough to eat. It is essential to adopt a measured response that takes into consideration the birds' need for food as well as the risk.
At a time when bird lovers are asked to refrain from feeding the wildlife, a bird-watching group in Miyagi Prefecture that observes geese from a distance of several hundred meters has had to cancel some of their events because they can't draw enough participants. Apparently, some people have overreacted to the bird flu virus and now view birds as "scary." This winter would be a good time to consider how to respond to the bird flu virus and the impact of feeding them on the ecosystem, and to rethink what the proper distance to maintain between wild birds and humans should be. ("Yoroku," a front-page column in the Mainichi Shimbun)
(Mainichi Japan) November 20, 2008
Bird lovers' feathers ruffled after being told not to feed migratory birds
The wild bird researcher and poet Godo Nakanishi once uttered these famous words: "Birds of the wild (should be) in the wild. Birds should be wild birds." He even coined the word "yacho" as a term to denote "wild bird." Indeed, when he founded the Wild Bird Association of Japan (Nihon Yacho no Kai) in 1934, the word "yacho" was so unfamiliar that many people read it as "nodori."
Up until that point in time, the Japanese had looked upon birds as something either to be eaten or to be put into cages. Godo urged people to "trample on their bird cages, and to go into the wild to appreciate birds in their natural state. That is what bird loving is all about." (As cited in "No no Tori wa No Ni" (Wild Birds to the Wild) by Teruyuki Kobayashi.) Today, the term "wild bird" is widely used, and Godo's bird loving philosophy, which requires that the distance of nature separate humans from birds, is widely accepted. But from time to time, questions are raised about where to draw the line between what humans should or should not do in order to protect wild birds.
This spring, after the deadly avian influenza (bird flu) virus was detected in swans in the Tohoku region, bird lovers began to refrain from their custom adhered to for many years of feeding migratory birds. Areas which until last year had been used to feed birds as a tourist attraction are now being roped off to prevent people from approaching the water.
Experts say that feeding birds encourages large flocks to congregate in particular areas, increasing the risk of infection. On the other hand, we can sympathize with the dismay of the citizens' groups that have fed birds for many years and now worry that the birds may not be getting enough to eat. It is essential to adopt a measured response that takes into consideration the birds' need for food as well as the risk.
At a time when bird lovers are asked to refrain from feeding the wildlife, a bird-watching group in Miyagi Prefecture that observes geese from a distance of several hundred meters has had to cancel some of their events because they can't draw enough participants. Apparently, some people have overreacted to the bird flu virus and now view birds as "scary." This winter would be a good time to consider how to respond to the bird flu virus and the impact of feeding them on the ecosystem, and to rethink what the proper distance to maintain between wild birds and humans should be. ("Yoroku," a front-page column in the Mainichi Shimbun)
(Mainichi Japan) November 20, 2008