• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Bird Flu Vaccine Protects People And Pets

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081019184800.htm

Bird Flu Vaccine Protects People And Pets

ScienceDaily (Oct. 19, 2008) ? A single vaccine could be used to protect chickens, cats and humans against deadly flu pandemics, according to an article published in the November issue of the Journal of General Virology. The vaccine protects birds and mammals against different flu strains and can even be given to birds while they are still in their eggs, allowing the mass vaccination of wild birds.

The emergence of bird flu has posed a major challenge to scientists designing vaccines as it can infect a number of different animals, including birds, pets and people. Now, researchers in the USA have discovered that a vaccine based on a bird flu virus could be used to protect several species against different influenza viruses.

"The world is experiencing a pandemic of influenza in birds caused by an H5N1 virus. Although it has been restricted to Eurasia and some countries in Africa, there is a risk that this virus may spread worldwide," said Professor Daniel Perez from the University of Maryland, USA. "The H5N1 virus also has an unusual expanded host range: not only birds and humans have been infected but also cats, which are usually resistant to influenza. To prepare for a pandemic, it would be ideal to have a vaccine that could be used in multiple animal species."

The researchers found that the central genes or 'backbone' of the H9N2 virus that infects guinea fowl can protect birds and mice against highly pathogenic strains of influenza. They modified the virus to make it less pathogenic and then used it to vaccinate mice. Three weeks after being vaccinated, the mice were infected with the potentially lethal H1N1 virus - the same virus that caused the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic. All the vaccinated mice survived with no signs of disease. Vaccinated mice also survived infection with the deadly H5N1 bird flu virus, again showing no signs of disease.

"Our results show that the H9N2 backbone vaccine can be used to protect mice against two different, highly pathogenic strains of influenza. We chose genes from H9N2 influenza for the vaccine because the virus can infect many different animals, including chickens, mice and pigs," said Professor Perez. "A very important limitation in the current design of flu vaccines is that they are usually species specific.
Our approach involves a universal backbone that can be used in several different species, including humans."

More importantly, this live attenuated virus provided effective protection when it was administered to birds before they had hatched. By vaccinating eggs against influenza, we could protect wild bird species as well as domestic chickens against pandemic flu strains, limiting the spread of disease to humans.

"If an emerging strain of bird flu spreads among a broad range of animal species, we should expect major health, economic and ecological consequences," said Professor Perez. "It is unrealistic to consider preparing different vaccines specifically tailored to different animal species in this situation. An influenza vaccine that could protect different species would save valuable time during a pandemic."

Journal reference:

1. Hickman et al. An avian live attenuated master backbone for potential use in epidemic and pandemic influenza vaccines. Journal of General Virology, 2008; 89 (11): 2682 DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/004143-0
 
Re: Bird Flu Vaccine Protects People And Pets

From the study:

A second issue has recently emerged during the preparation of inactivated vaccines and is related to the human health risks of personnel exposed to AIVs whose interspecies potential is poorly defined.

The potential of reassortment of the surface genes of our vaccine virus with a wild-type virus would limit its use in domestic birds, although this risk could be greatly minimized by performing in ovo vaccination, as we have shown recently (Song et al., 2007).

Our approach should also allow the mass vaccination of wild bird species in which the H5N1 virus appears to have gone through cycles of increased virulence, the ecological consequences of which remain to be seen.
 
Re: Bird Flu Vaccine Protects People And Pets

Mike Coston aka Fla_Medic has a thougthfull comment on the reports on this study:

Not Exactly A Magic Bullet

- snip -

So while this is valuable research, and may someday lead to new techniques for vaccine manufacturing, it is a bit early to pop the Champaign corks.

More: http://afludiary.blogspot.com/
 
Re: Bird Flu Vaccine Protects People And Pets

I don't understand what is different between the 2 vaccines; is it that they used central genes (verus other ? genes)?
Here are a couple of previous articles:

H9N2 flu vaccine looks good in clinical trial
Sep 26, 2006 (CIDRAP News) – Scientists reported yesterday that an experimental vaccine triggered a good immune response to H9N2 avian influenza virus, a type that has caused a few human infections and is considered capable of evolving into a pandemic strain.

In a phase 1 trial, the researchers tested the vaccine in 96 healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 34. The vaccine consisted of purified preparations of the viral surface proteins hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, derived from an H9N2 virus isolated from chickens in Hong Kong in 1997.

On the negative side, the researchers found that the vaccine generated little reaction to an H9N2 virus different from the one used in the vaccine. Only a minority of the volunteers showed any immune response to this virus, and none had a strong response. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/panflu/news/sep2606vaccine.html

Baby in Hong Kong infected with H9N2 avian flu
Mar 20, 2007 (CIDRAP News)
In 2004 the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), concerned that H9N2 could evolve into a pandemic strain, contracted with Chiron Corp. (now part of Novartis) to produce a vaccine against the virus. Last September scientists reported that the experimental vaccine generated a good immune response in a phase 1 clinical trial.

The contract called on Chiron to make 40,000 doses of the vaccine, based on an inactivated strain of H9N2 developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The report on the clinical trial results said H9N2 viruses are widespread in Eurasian poultry. Two of the three different Asian lineages of these viruses can bind to human as well as bird cell receptors (sialic acid residues) and therefore may be more likely to infect humans than other avian flu viruses are, the authors wrote. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/panflu/news/mar2007h9n2.html

See the study here: http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=83567
 
Re: Bird Flu Vaccine Protects People And Pets

I read all 9 pages of it this morning; sometimes these studies are beyond my understanding. OR maybe I didn't read it thoroughly.
I think you read in depth the article. But perhaps it's the newswire that emphasized too much the conclusion of this study.
 
Back
Top