• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Bird Flu Vaccine Priority: Tough Decisions

KC

Moderator
Bird Flu Vaccine Priority: Tough Decisions
by UPI Wire
May 16, 2006
http://www.postchronicle.com/news/health/article_21218953.shtml


WASHINGTON, May 16, 2006 (UPI) -- U.S. heath ethicists are considering bird flu pandemic priorities -- specifically, when there isn't enough vaccine for everyone, who gets the first doses?

University of Vermont ethicist Alan Wertheimer, professor emeritus of political science and current visiting scholar at the National Institutes of Health, along with NIH's Bioethics Chief Ezekiel Emanuel, recommend placing healthy people from early adolescence to middle age toward the front of the line for vaccination.

They argue vaccine policy should consider the amount an individual has invested in his or her life. A 20-year-old, they suggest, has developed more unfulfilled interests, plans and hopes than a baby and, therefore, deserves a higher priority for vaccine.

Wertheimer concedes the subject is controversial.

"People don't like to ask the sorts of the questions in this paper," Wertheimer said. "It would be nice if we did not have to confront this issue. And we may not have to. But at some point, it seems likely that we may have to confront a pandemic or something else that poses a similar dilemma."

The study appears in the journal Science.
 
Back
Top