• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Bird flu report reveals failings

AlaskaDenise

In Memoriam
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/6132812.stm

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=760 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=10></TD><TD vAlign=top width=629><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width=629>Last Updated: Thursday, 9 November 2006, 15:14 GMT


<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>


</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S BO --><!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
_41616140_dead_birds_pa.jpg
Some 51,000 chickens were slaughtered in Norfolk


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA --><!-- S SF -->A report into how an outbreak of bird flu in Norfolk was dealt with has exposed a number of shortcomings.


Norfolk County Council reviewed the response to the H7N3 outbreak at three farms in North Tuddenham in March.

One fault highlighted was a breakdown in communication between the government and local authorities which led to the wrong wording used on warning signs.

However, the report concludes that communication improved and the overall response was effective.

<!-- E SF -->
The wording for the 1km restriction zone had to be changed from "protective zone" to "restricted zone" after the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) decided to use legislation which was about to be brought into place.

Protective clothing

Concerns were also raised that the Government News Network was not immediately available at the scene to help co-ordinate the media response.

"Defra needs to place more trust in local agencies to not mis-use any information passed in confidence to local agencies," the report stated.

Another issue was that police officers at the scene of the incident did not have any protective clothing at the start of the outbreak.

They were on occasions exposed to feathers and dust being thrown up into the air when culled birds were being bagged.
Thousands of birds were culled after the H7N3 strain was discovered.

The chickens at Norwich Road Farm and Mowles Manor Poultry Unit at North Tuddenham were slaughtered after tests showed they had the H7N3 strain.

A cull of 35,000 chickens at the nearby Witford Lodge Farm also took place.

The carcasses were transported to designated incinerators in other parts of the country. One poultry worker contracted the H7 strain of bird flu in the form of conjunctivitis.

Three others tested negative for the disease.<!-- E BO -->

.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Back
Top