tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Biostatistics
. 2023 Mar 6;kxad003.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad003. Online ahead of print.
A Bayesian approach to estimating COVID-19 incidence and infection fatality rates
Justin J Slater[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aiyush Bansal[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Harlan Campbell[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jeffrey S Rosenthal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paul Gustafson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Patrick E Brown[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Naive estimates of incidence and infection fatality rates (IFR) of coronavirus disease 2019 suffer from a variety of biases, many of which relate to preferential testing. This has motivated epidemiologists from around the globe to conduct serosurveys that measure the immunity of individuals by testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the blood. These quantitative measures (titer values) are then used as a proxy for previous or current infection. However, statistical methods that use this data to its full potential have yet to be developed. Previous researchers have discretized these continuous values, discarding potentially useful information. In this article, we demonstrate how multivariate mixture models can be used in combination with post-stratification to estimate cumulative incidence and IFR in an approximate Bayesian framework without discretization. In doing so, we account for uncertainty from both the estimated number of infections and incomplete deaths data to provide estimates of IFR. This method is demonstrated using data from the Action to Beat Coronavirus erosurvey in Canada.
Keywords: Bayesian analysis; COVID-19; Mixture model; Modular inference; Post-stratification.
. 2023 Mar 6;kxad003.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad003. Online ahead of print.
A Bayesian approach to estimating COVID-19 incidence and infection fatality rates
Justin J Slater[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aiyush Bansal[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Harlan Campbell[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jeffrey S Rosenthal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paul Gustafson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Patrick E Brown[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36881693
- DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad003
Abstract
Naive estimates of incidence and infection fatality rates (IFR) of coronavirus disease 2019 suffer from a variety of biases, many of which relate to preferential testing. This has motivated epidemiologists from around the globe to conduct serosurveys that measure the immunity of individuals by testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the blood. These quantitative measures (titer values) are then used as a proxy for previous or current infection. However, statistical methods that use this data to its full potential have yet to be developed. Previous researchers have discretized these continuous values, discarding potentially useful information. In this article, we demonstrate how multivariate mixture models can be used in combination with post-stratification to estimate cumulative incidence and IFR in an approximate Bayesian framework without discretization. In doing so, we account for uncertainty from both the estimated number of infections and incomplete deaths data to provide estimates of IFR. This method is demonstrated using data from the Action to Beat Coronavirus erosurvey in Canada.
Keywords: Bayesian analysis; COVID-19; Mixture model; Modular inference; Post-stratification.