• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Biomedicines . Assessment of the Humoral Immune Response Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Healthcare Workers: A One Year Longitudinal Study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Biomedicines


. 2022 Jun 28;10(7):1526.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071526.
Assessment of the Humoral Immune Response Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Healthcare Workers: A One Year Longitudinal Study


Mihaela Chivu-Economescu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Teodora Vremera[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Simona Maria Ruta[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Camelia Grancea[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mihaela Leustean[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daniela Chiriac[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Adina David[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lilia Matei[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carmen C Diaconu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Adina Gatea[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ciprian Ilie[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Iuliana Radu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ana Maria Cornienco[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Luminita Smaranda Iancu[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Catalin Cirstoiu[SUP] 4 7 [/SUP], Corina Silvia Pop[SUP] 4 7 [/SUP], Radu Petru[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP], Victor Strambu[SUP] 4 8 [/SUP], Stefan Malciolu[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Corneliu Petru Popescu[SUP] 4 9 [/SUP], Simin Aysel Florescu[SUP] 4 9 [/SUP], Alexandru Rafila[SUP] 4 10 [/SUP], Florentina Ligia Furtunescu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Adriana Pistol[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The continuous variability of SARS-CoV-2 and the rapid waning of specific antibodies threatens the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. We aimed to evaluate antibody kinetics one year after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with an mRNA vaccine in healthcare workers (HCW), with or without a booster. A marked decline in anti-Spike(S)/Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) antibody levels was registered during the first eight months post-vaccination, followed by a transitory increase after the booster. At three months post-booster an increased antibody level was maintained only in HCW vaccinated after a prior infection, who also developed a higher and long-lasting level of anti-S IgA antibodies. Still, IgG anti-nucleocapsid (NCP) fades five months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite the decline in antibodies one-year post-vaccination, 68.2% of HCW preserved the neutralization capacity against the ancestral variant, with a decrease of only 17.08% in the neutralizing capacity against the Omicron variant. Nevertheless, breakthrough infections were present in 6.65% of all participants, without any correlation with the previous level of anti-S/RBD IgG. Protection against the ancestral and Omicron variants is maintained at least three months after a booster in HCW, possibly reflecting a continuous antigenic stimulation in the professional setting.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; booster dose; breakthrough infections; healthcare workers; host factors; immune response; vaccination.
 
Back
Top Bottom