• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Beliefs and attitudes towards the influenza vaccine in high-risk individuals

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Apr 24:1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000814. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Beliefs and attitudes towards the influenza vaccine in high-risk individuals.[/h] Santos AJ[SUP]1[/SUP], Kislaya I[SUP]1[/SUP], Machado A[SUP]1[/SUP], Nunes B[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Societal and economic impact of influenza is mainly due to influenza infection of specific groups, who are at higher risk of health complications leading up to hospitalisation or death. In this study we applied the health belief model (HBM) to evaluate beliefs and attitudes towards influenza disease and vaccine in community-dwelling high-risk individuals (aged 65 or more or having a chronic disease). We conducted a mixed-method study using data collected through a telephone survey of a household unit sample. We used thematic analysis to map responses to HBM dimensions and Poisson regression to model vaccine non-uptake prevalence. The main self-reported reason not to take the vaccine referred to the susceptibility dimension: 'considering oneself to be a healthy person' (29?8%, (95% confidence interval (CI) 22?1-38?7)). Bad experiences after vaccination - barriers dimension - were also commonly reported (17?0%, (95% CI 10?8-23?8)). Vaccine non-uptake prevalence was 22% higher in those who did not consider themselves susceptible to contract flu (Prevalence Ratio (PR) = 1?22, (95% CI 1?0-1?5)) and 18% lower in those who did not consider that the vaccine causes flu symptoms (PR = 0?82, (95% CI 0?68-0?99)). Results suggest that high-risk individuals do not think of themselves susceptible to influenza infection and fear adverse events following immunisation.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Chronic disease; elderly; health belief model; high-risk; influenza vaccine; vaccine non-uptake

PMID: 28434418 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268817000814
 
Back
Top Bottom