• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Bayesian model choice for epidemic models with two levels of mixing

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Biostatistics. 2013 Jul 24. [Epub ahead of print]
Bayesian model choice for epidemic models with two levels of mixing.
Knock ES, O'Neill PD.
Source

School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Abstract

This paper considers the problem of choosing between competing models for infectious disease final outcome data in a population that is partitioned into households. The epidemic models are stochastic individual-based transmission models of the susceptible-infective-removed type. The main focus is on various algorithms for the estimation of Bayes factors, of which a path sampling-based algorithm is seen to give the best results. We also explore theoretical properties in the case where the within-model prior distributions become increasingly uninformative, which show the need for caution when using Bayes factors as a model choice tool. A suitable form of deviance information criterion is also considered for comparison. The theory and methods are illustrated with both artificial data, and influenza data from the Tecumseh study of illness.
KEYWORDS:

Bayes factors, Bayesian inference, Deviance information criterion, Epidemic model, Model choice, Path sampling

PMID:
23887980
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23887980
 
Back
Top Bottom