• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Assessment of Serosurveys for H5N1

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Feb 5. [Epub ahead of print]
Assessment of Serosurveys for H5N1.
Toner ES, Adalja AA, Nuzzo JB, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Burke DS.
Source

Center for Biosecurity, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 621 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.
Abstract

Background. It has been suggested that the true case fatality rate of human H5N1 influenza infection is appreciably less than the figure of approximately 60% that is based on official WHO confirmed case reports because asymptomatic cases may have been missed. A number of sero-epidemiological studies have been conducted in an attempt to identify such missed cases.Methods. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of all English language H5N1 human serology surveys with detailed attention to laboratory methodology used (including whether investigators used criteria set by the WHO to define positive cases), laboratory controls used, and the clades/genotypes involved.Results. 29 studies were included in the analysis. Few reported using unexposed control groups and one third did not apply WHO criteria. Of studies that used WHO criteria, only 4 found any sero-positive results to clades/genotypes of H5N1 that are currently circulating. No studies reported sero-positive results to the clade 2/ genotype Z viruses that have spread throughout Eurasia and Africa.Conclusions. This review suggests that the frequency of positive H5 serology results is likely to be low; therefore, it is essential that future studies adhere to WHO criteria and include unexposed controls in their laboratory assays to limit the likelihood of false positive results.


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23386633
PMID:
23386633
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom