tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
MSMR. 2018 Jan;25(1):10-15.
[h=1]Assessment of 12 influenza-like illness case definitions using Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based Influenza Surveillance Program data, 2011-2014.[/h] DeMarcus LS, Soderlund LV, Voss JD.
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Despite the growth in influenza surveillance programs, standardization of a globally accepted influenza-like illness (ILI) case definition remains difficult. With 2011-2014 Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based Influenza Surveillance Program (DISP) data, 12 case definitions were evaluated using a combination of ILI case definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, and the DISP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and odds ratios for each case definition were calculated. Additionally, area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to compare the case definitions. Between 2 October 2011 and 27 September 2014, 52.3% (5,575 of 10,662) of respiratory specimens submitted met the inclusion criteria. The case definition for the DISP had a sensitivity of 54.6% and specificity of 63.7%. Case definitions should be selected according to the objectives of the surveillance system and resources available. Sensitive case definitions capture a larger proportion of cases but at the cost of testing more specimens. Definitions with higher specificity result in fewer false positives but may miss more cases.
PMID: 29381078
[h=1]Assessment of 12 influenza-like illness case definitions using Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based Influenza Surveillance Program data, 2011-2014.[/h] DeMarcus LS, Soderlund LV, Voss JD.
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Despite the growth in influenza surveillance programs, standardization of a globally accepted influenza-like illness (ILI) case definition remains difficult. With 2011-2014 Department of Defense Global, Laboratory-based Influenza Surveillance Program (DISP) data, 12 case definitions were evaluated using a combination of ILI case definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, World Health Organization, and the DISP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and odds ratios for each case definition were calculated. Additionally, area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to compare the case definitions. Between 2 October 2011 and 27 September 2014, 52.3% (5,575 of 10,662) of respiratory specimens submitted met the inclusion criteria. The case definition for the DISP had a sensitivity of 54.6% and specificity of 63.7%. Case definitions should be selected according to the objectives of the surveillance system and resources available. Sensitive case definitions capture a larger proportion of cases but at the cost of testing more specimens. Definitions with higher specificity result in fewer false positives but may miss more cases.
PMID: 29381078