• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Assessing vaccine efficacy in influenza clinical trials: challenges and difficulties

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;6(4):403-11. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2013.811817.
Assessing vaccine efficacy in influenza clinical trials: challenges and difficulties.
Dewe W, Benoit A, Legrand C.
Source

GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rue de l' Institut 89, 1330 Rixensart, Belgium. walthere.p.dewe@gsk.com.
Abstract

The efficacy assessment of an influenza vaccine often requires conducting large and expensive clinical trials. Specificities of influenza increase the complexity of the study designs, of the subsequent statistical analysis and of the interpretation of the results. They include low attack rates, seasonality, multiplicity and frequent mutations of flu viruses as well as heterogeneity of virus circulation, varying annual vaccine composition and so on. The authors discuss how those factors may impact the design, the conduct and the analysis of an efficacy trial and explain why it may fail whatever the true vaccine efficacy. The authors then argue that extending the length to several consecutive seasons is an alternative to the frequently used 1-year design and propose refinements of the statistical models.

PMID:
23927668
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927668
 
Back
Top Bottom