• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

Pathfinder

Editor, Senior Moderator
Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit
Lawyers say it could be illegal to ask employees to cough up personal information concerning Swine Flu

By LISA JENNINGS
(Oct. 12, 2009)

Picture the following scenario: Sally the server has just arrived for her shift, but she doesn?t look well. She is coughing, hoarse with a sore throat and just asked a coworker to feel her forehead for fever.

That scenario is likely to repeat itself throughout restaurants nationwide in coming months in what is anticipated to be a flu season made even more brutal by the appearance of H1N1, or swine flu. As restaurateurs heighten their hygiene practices to prevent outbreaks from what has already been declared a pandemic, they also need to know some of the legal aspects of dealing with H1N1.

For instance, when Sally walks in the door, it?s not a good idea for her manager to ask if she has the dreaded swine flu, say attorneys around the country, who have been fielding many questions about H1N1. Asking whether an employee has swine flu could be considered a disability-related inquiry, which is prohibited under the Americans with Disabilities Act, they note.

The spread of H1N1?and the likelihood that it may soon appear in more workplaces?intensified this fall as kids returned to the collective germ pool of school campuses and then brought those germs home to working parents.


Experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advise employers to tell team members to stay home until flu symptoms are gone or are treated.
In late September, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported an unusual level of widespread influenza activity in 26 states, particularly in the South, and employers were being urged to prepare for the possibility of an outbreak in their communities.

The Americans with Disabilities Act sets limits for when and how employers may inquire about medical conditions, and though the swine flu may not technically be considered a disability ?it could be perceived as disabling because of myths about it,? said attorney Jonathan Mook, an ADA specialist with DiMuroGinsberg in Alexandria, Va.

Mook said the legal issues are similar to those related to HIV infection.

If an employer asks specifically about swine flu, for example, and later is perceived as not wanting to work near the employee, even after the worker is no longer contagious, there may be grounds for a discrimination complaint, he said.

The ADA also requires that an employee?s medical conditions be kept private, attorneys say.

That means managers should not announce that Sally the server is out with the swine flu, even if she has volunteered that information to co-workers, said Martin Ellis, an attorney with Butler, Vines & Babb in Knoxville, Tenn.


Swine flu inquiries may expose employers to discrimination lawsuits, according to legal experts.
?You can tell workers that you are concerned that they may have been exposed? to swine flu without identifying the employee who may have exposed them, he said.

Instead, legal experts say employers should focus on symptoms.

In communities where an outbreak occurs, it is a good idea to include in every preshift meeting questions about specific symptoms related to the flu. It?s also OK for employers to ask whether employees have fevers, sore throats, coughs or intestinal ills, so long as they don?t ask for a diagnosis.

Asking employees directly if they have swine flu might open a business up to legal action, but employers are permitted send visibly sick workers home.
In addition, attorneys say, employers are permitted to send employees home if they?re showing symptoms of the flu and are allowed to ask them to stay home for three to seven days, as recommended by the CDC in Atlanta?or as long as necessary to complete treatment, such as antiviral medication.

As a result, eligible employees may be requesting leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, or FMLA, which provides up to 12 weeks of job-protected, unpaid time off to care for their serious health condition or that of an immediate family member.

Unlike the more common version of influenza that occurs every year, many attorneys agree that H1N1 would be considered a ?serious medical condition? for which eligible employees can take FMLA leave because the World Health Organization has declared the viral illness a pandemic.

Attorney Janet Grumer with Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in Los Angeles said some employees may only have a mild case of the flu, ?but we have to treat it as though it could be a serious medical condition.?

?We don?t want to find out we?ve run afoul of the law by getting a lawsuit,? she said.

That doesn?t mean, however, that employees need a doctor?s note to prove they have swine flu, said Jimmy Wright, an attorney with Butler, Vines & Babb.

In the case of swine flu, the CDC has discouraged employers to ask for such documentation because of concerns that medical clinics will be overwhelmed.

Failing to establish clear policies about illness and absenteeism during a pandemic could also be a risk to employers, Mook said.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, employers are bound to furnish a safe workplace, and failing to take reasonable steps to prevent or abate a known hazard could put them in violation.

In the end, it doesn?t matter if the employee is sick with the H1N1 virus or seasonal flu.

?A lot of employers are just saying they want their sick employees away from the facility,? Wright said. ?We don?t care whether it?s H1N1, they?re saying, ?You?re gone.??

The CDC recommends that employers review sick-leave policies to encourage employees to stay home until they are fever-free for at least 24 hours.

For hourly employees that might not receive sick-leave pay that could be difficult, but employers can insist that workers stay home until they are symptom-free.

?They can always send them home if they show up for work with symptoms,? Grumer said.

Employers should also be aware of state and local laws that may offer support to workers who are out sick or caring for a sick loved one for a period longer than they expected.

In California, for example, disability pay is available for those who miss two weeks or more, Grumer said.

?And these are employee-funded programs,? she said, ?so it?s important to be aware of some of these state benefits that cost nothing for employers.??


http://www.nrn.com/article.aspx?menu_id=1396&id=374230
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

Excerpts from post #1 text:

"As a result, eligible employees may be requesting leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, or FMLA, which provides up to 12 weeks of job-protected, unpaid time off to care for their serious health condition or that of an immediate family member.

Unlike the more common version of influenza that occurs every year, many attorneys agree that H1N1 would be considered a “serious medical condition” for which eligible employees can take FMLA leave because the World Health Organization has declared the viral illness a pandemic.

Attorney Janet Grumer with Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in Los Angeles said some employees may only have a mild case of the flu, “but we have to treat it as though it could be a serious medical condition.”

...

That doesn’t mean, however, that employees need a doctor’s note to prove they have swine flu, said Jimmy Wright, an attorney with Butler, Vines & Babb.

In the case of swine flu, the CDC has discouraged employers to ask for such documentation because of concerns that medical clinics will be overwhelmed.

Failing to establish clear policies about illness and absenteeism during a pandemic could also be a risk to employers, Mook said.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, employers are bound to furnish a safe workplace, and failing to take reasonable steps to prevent or abate a known hazard could put them in violation.

...

Employers should also be aware of state and local laws that may offer support to workers who are out sick or caring for a sick loved one for a period longer than they expected.

In California, for example, disability pay is available for those who miss two weeks or more, Grumer said.

“And these are employee-funded programs,” she said, “so it’s important to be aware of some of these state benefits that cost nothing for employers.”—
___


Also from #1:

"For instance, when Sally walks in the door, it’s not a good idea for her manager to ask if she has the dreaded swine flu, say attorneys around the country, who have been fielding many questions about H1N1. Asking whether an employee has swine flu could be considered a disability-related inquiry, which is prohibited under the Americans with Disabilities Act, they note."

___



Somewhere probably exist also an:
"human transmissible infectious disease defence act", which could allow the questioning/ousting the presence of (from such diseases) infected humans at public places, at least between the workforce, to not stimulate the infection spreading at work ...
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

more and more I feel that US-laws are outside the reality
and inappropriate
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

more and more I fel that US-laws are outside the reality
and inappropriate
How does the situation differ in Germany?

Can employers inquire about the health status of an employee & take action based on that information?

Do employees get any financial compensation when they're unable to come to work due to illness?

.
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

In Ontario, the Department of Public Health has powers which override the rights of individuals (for the benefit of the population as a whole). For example, our public health department can force any individual to be placed in quarantine. They determine where, when, and for how long.
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

just only asking something can't be illegal , in "the land of the free", IMO,
or lead to negative consequences.
You needn't answer. What they use the answer for ... that's another issue.
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

Remember that journalists are in the business of writing stories. Stories only sell if they have a new or unique twist. The point of this article revolves around singling out employees and questioning them about their specific disease or illness. Good fodder for litigation.

In reality, employers can protect themselves by having a clear, written policy regarding employees who come to work with a communicable, infectious disease while they can still infect other workers. The employer has no need to ask or determine which disease it is. Applying the company sickness policy equitably to all employees will insure that the employer will be relatively safe from frivolous lawsuits.
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

IMO, this is just lawyers advertising their services to employees who need some extra cash and to scare employers into hiring lawyers to write their H1N1 policies. Remember, laws are written by lawyers to keep themselves employed and represent the biggest conflict of interest around.
 
Re: Asking about H1N1 can expose risk to lawsuit

IMO, this is just lawyers advertising their services to employees who need some extra cash and to scare employers into hiring lawyers to write their H1N1 policies. Remember, laws are written by lawyers to keep themselves employed and represent the biggest conflict of interest around.


I doubt it was the main reason.

I see it more as an advertising lifeboat (for illnessed employers or their families) of how to not loosing their jobs (but without earning money) when inabilitated:

#1:
"under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, or FMLA, which provides up to 12 weeks of job-protected, unpaid time off to care for their serious health condition or that of an immediate family member"


It can be named also as: the "Unpaid Medical Leave Act" ...
 
Back
Top Bottom