tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
ASAIO J
. 2024 May 30.
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243. Online ahead of print. Outcomes of Adult Patients With COVID-19 Transitioning From Venovenous to Venoarterial or Hybrid Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry
Khoa Nguyen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ahmed Altibi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pooja Prasad[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Srini Mukundan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kiran Shekar[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kollengode Ramanathan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bishoy Zakhary[SUP] 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
This retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry evaluates the outcomes and identifies risk factors associated with conversion from initial venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support to venoarterial or hybrid ECMO in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We collected deidentified data on all adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with COVID who received venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between March 2020 and November 2022. Patients initially placed on an ECMO configuration other than venovenous (VV) ECMO were excluded from the analysis. Our analysis included data from 12,850 patients, of which 393 (3.1%) transitioned from VV ECMO to an alternative mode. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and the conversion group exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality rate. We also examined baseline variables, including demographic information, biochemical labs, and inotrope requirements. Univariate analysis revealed that pre-ECMO arrest, the need for renal replacement therapy, and the use of inotropic agents, particularly milrinone, were strongly associated with the risk of conversion. Notably, even after implementing a 3:1 propensity score matching, the impact of conversion on both mortality and complications remained substantial. Our study underscores an elevated risk of mortality for COVID-19 patients initially treated with VV ECMO who subsequently require conversion to VA-ECMO or hybrid ECMO.
. 2024 May 30.
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243. Online ahead of print. Outcomes of Adult Patients With COVID-19 Transitioning From Venovenous to Venoarterial or Hybrid Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry
Khoa Nguyen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ahmed Altibi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pooja Prasad[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Srini Mukundan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kiran Shekar[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kollengode Ramanathan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bishoy Zakhary[SUP] 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38810234
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243
This retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry evaluates the outcomes and identifies risk factors associated with conversion from initial venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support to venoarterial or hybrid ECMO in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We collected deidentified data on all adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with COVID who received venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between March 2020 and November 2022. Patients initially placed on an ECMO configuration other than venovenous (VV) ECMO were excluded from the analysis. Our analysis included data from 12,850 patients, of which 393 (3.1%) transitioned from VV ECMO to an alternative mode. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and the conversion group exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality rate. We also examined baseline variables, including demographic information, biochemical labs, and inotrope requirements. Univariate analysis revealed that pre-ECMO arrest, the need for renal replacement therapy, and the use of inotropic agents, particularly milrinone, were strongly associated with the risk of conversion. Notably, even after implementing a 3:1 propensity score matching, the impact of conversion on both mortality and complications remained substantial. Our study underscores an elevated risk of mortality for COVID-19 patients initially treated with VV ECMO who subsequently require conversion to VA-ECMO or hybrid ECMO.