• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Arch Razi Inst . Avian Influenza-Killed Vaccine on Tissue Distribution and Shedding of Avian Influenza Virus H9N2 in Ducklings

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Arch Razi Inst


. 2021 Sep 1;76(3):437-444.
doi: 10.22092/ari.2020.342078.1452. eCollection Summer 2021.
Avian Influenza-Killed Vaccine on Tissue Distribution and Shedding of Avian Influenza Virus H9N2 in Ducklings


Haji M Abdi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], M Mayahi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Z Boroomand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], A Shoshtari[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Ducks play an important role in the transmission of avian influenza to poultry farms. Because of the importance of vaccination in reducing virus shedding, this study evaluated avian influenza-killed vaccine H9N2 on tissue distribution and shedding of avian influenza virus H9N2 in ducklings. One hundred-day-old ducklings were purchased and, after bleeding from 20 birds, were kept in four separate rooms under standard conditions. Groups 1 and 2 were vaccinated at 9 days, and groups 2 and 3 were challenged with 0.1 ml of allantoic fluid containing 10[SUP]5[/SUP] EID[SUB]50[/SUB] (A/chicken/Iran/Aid/2013(H9)) virus intranasally at 30 days. Group 4 chicks were kept as the control group. Chicks were observed two times daily. On days 1, 3, 5, and 8 after inoculation, 3 chicks were randomly selected from each group and cloaca and trachea swabs samples were collected from each bird. Then the ducklings were euthanized and trachea, lung, spleen, intestine, liver, and brain tissue samples were collected for molecular detection. The virus was detected in the tissues and tracheal and cloacal swabs by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and anti-AIV titres were measured by HI test. The results showed no clinical signs in the challenged groups. In the vaccinated challenged group, virus was detected only in cloacal swabs, but in the unvaccinated challenged group, virus was detected more in tracheal swabs than in cloacal swabs. In challenged-unvaccinated chicks, virus was detected in the trachea and lungs, and in challenged-vaccinated birds, virus was detected in the intestines. In conclusion, vaccinating ducks against the AI H9N2 virus reduced shedding and tissue distribution of AI viruses in challenged ducks.

Keywords: avian influenza virus H9N2; ducklings; replication; shedding; vaccination.
 
Back
Top Bottom