tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Arch Pathol Lab Med
. 2021 Jan 1;145(1):32-38.
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0499-SA.
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of the Roche Elecsys and Abbott Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Serology Assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Shaun S Tan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sharon Saw[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ka Lip Chew[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cindy Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anastacia Pajarillaga[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Candy Khoo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Weixuan Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zahidah Mohamed Ali[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhixin Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yiong Huak Chan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Paul Tambyah[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Roland Jureen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sunil K Sethi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Context.—: The use of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic tests detects antibodies in the host, contributing to the identification of individuals who have been exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Objective.—: To critically evaluate 2 commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serology tests.
Design.—: A total of 333 unique, nonduplicated serum samples obtained from COVID-19 patients (n = 170) and negative controls (n = 163) obtained before December 2019 were used in the study. Samples were tested on the Roche E411 and Abbott Architect i4000SR platforms, and results were correlated to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results and clinical symptoms.
Results.—: There was a strong level of agreement in the qualitative results between both assays, with a Cohen κ value of .840, P < .001. The specificity for both Roche and Abbott were excellent at 100%. Roche exhibited marginally better performance in the 21 days or more group with a sensitivity of 90.6% (95% CI, 75.8%-96.8%) versus an Abbott sensitivity of 84.4% (95% CI, 68.3%-93.1%), as well as in the 14- to 20-day group with a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 65.4%-95.0%) versus an Abbott sensitivity of 81.0% (95% CI, 60.0%-92.3%). Less than 14 days of symptoms groups exhibited poor sensitivity at less than 50% for both assays. The areas under curve (? standard error) for Roche (0.894 ? 0.025, P < .001) and Abbott (0.884 ? 0.026, P < .001) were very similar. Potential confounders for negative serologic results include antiretroviral medication use and pauci-symptomatic patients.
Conclusions.—: Specificities for high-throughput Roche and Abbott immunoassays are excellent, but users need to be cautious to interpret serologic test results after 14 days of symptoms to avoid false negatives.
. 2021 Jan 1;145(1):32-38.
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0499-SA.
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of the Roche Elecsys and Abbott Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Serology Assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Shaun S Tan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sharon Saw[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ka Lip Chew[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cindy Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anastacia Pajarillaga[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Candy Khoo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Weixuan Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zahidah Mohamed Ali[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhixin Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yiong Huak Chan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Paul Tambyah[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Roland Jureen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sunil K Sethi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33367664
- DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0499-SA
Abstract
Context.—: The use of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic tests detects antibodies in the host, contributing to the identification of individuals who have been exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Objective.—: To critically evaluate 2 commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serology tests.
Design.—: A total of 333 unique, nonduplicated serum samples obtained from COVID-19 patients (n = 170) and negative controls (n = 163) obtained before December 2019 were used in the study. Samples were tested on the Roche E411 and Abbott Architect i4000SR platforms, and results were correlated to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results and clinical symptoms.
Results.—: There was a strong level of agreement in the qualitative results between both assays, with a Cohen κ value of .840, P < .001. The specificity for both Roche and Abbott were excellent at 100%. Roche exhibited marginally better performance in the 21 days or more group with a sensitivity of 90.6% (95% CI, 75.8%-96.8%) versus an Abbott sensitivity of 84.4% (95% CI, 68.3%-93.1%), as well as in the 14- to 20-day group with a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 65.4%-95.0%) versus an Abbott sensitivity of 81.0% (95% CI, 60.0%-92.3%). Less than 14 days of symptoms groups exhibited poor sensitivity at less than 50% for both assays. The areas under curve (? standard error) for Roche (0.894 ? 0.025, P < .001) and Abbott (0.884 ? 0.026, P < .001) were very similar. Potential confounders for negative serologic results include antiretroviral medication use and pauci-symptomatic patients.
Conclusions.—: Specificities for high-throughput Roche and Abbott immunoassays are excellent, but users need to be cautious to interpret serologic test results after 14 days of symptoms to avoid false negatives.