• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Arch Cardiol Mex . Should a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection be considered a risk or prognostic factor for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Arch Cardiol Mex


. 2022 Sep 8.
doi: 10.24875/ACM.22000153. Online ahead of print.
Should a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection be considered a risk or prognostic factor for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?


Kietseé A Díaz-Domínguez[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrés Cruz-Melendez[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Luis M Amezcua-Castillo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jazmin A Guerra-López[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Claudia Tavera-Alonso[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Héctor González-Pacheco[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Luis M Amezcua-Guerra[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess whether a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection could by itself be a risk or prognostic factor for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Method: An observational study in unvaccinated patients with STEMI confirmed by cardiac catheterization was conducted. A recent or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection was identified by the presence of serum IgG against the nucleocapsid protein, or a positive polymerase chain reaction test on nasopharyngeal swabs. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors, clinical STEMI severity, main catheterization findings, and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization were compared between study subgroups.
Results: Of a total of 89 patients recruited, 14 (16%) had a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with STEMI and recent SARS-CoV-2 infection had a markedly lower frequency of high blood pressure (20% versus 55%; P = 0.03) as well as a tendency to have fewer comorbidities. Regarding the clinical presentation, there were no differences in the severity of the STEMI. Furthermore, the main findings during cardiac catheterization including the atherosclerotic burden and the number of vessels affected, as well as the occurrence of MACE during follow-up, were not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusions: A recent SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to facilitate the triggering of STEMI, as these patients have fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors than their uninfected counterparts. However, this does not seem to affect the clinical presentation or the in-hospital course of STEMI patients.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
 
Back
Top Bottom