Antiviral cyclic d,l-α-peptides: Targeting a general biochemical pathway in virus inf

[Mingus]

doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.051
[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif] Copyright ? 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved. [/FONT] Antiviral cyclic d,l-α-peptides: Targeting a general biochemical pathway in virus infections


W. Seth Horne^a, Christopher M. Wiethoff^b, Chunli Cui^b, Keith M. Wilcoxen^a, Manuel Amorin^a, M. Reza Ghadiri^a^,^c^,^, and Glen R. Nemerow^b^,^,

^aDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
^bDepartment of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
^cThe Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037, USA

Received 21 April 2005; accepted 10 May 2005. Available online 1 July 2005.



Abstract

Diverse virus families have evolved to exploit the acidification of endosomal compartments to gain entry into cells. We describe a supramolecular approach for selectively targeting and inhibiting viral infections through this central biochemical pathway. Using adenovirus as a model non-enveloped virus, we have determined that an eight-residue cyclic d,l-α-peptide, selected from a directed combinatorial library, can specifically prevent the development of low pH in endocytic vesicles, arrest the escape of virions from the endosome, and abrogate adenovirus infection without an apparent adverse effect on cell viability. The likely generality of this approach against other pH-dependent viral infections is supported by the inhibition of type-A influenza virus escape from endosomes in the presence of the same peptide. Our studies suggest that self-assembling cyclic d,l-α-peptides hold considerable potential as a new rational supramolecular approach toward the design and discovery of broad-spectrum antiviral agents.



Graphical abstract

Using adenovirus as a model non-enveloped virus, we have determined that eight-residue cyclic d,l-α-peptides can specifically prevent the development of low pH in endocytic vesicles, arresting the escape of virions from the endosome and preventing gene delivery by the virus.

(13K)

Keywords: Cyclic peptide; Antiviral; Adenovirus; Influenza

Article Outline

<dl><dt>1. Introduction</dt><dt>2. Results and discussion</dt><dt>3. Conclusion</dt><dt>4. Materials and methods</dt><dl><dt>4.1. General</dt><dt>4.2. Synthesis of cyclic d,l-α-peptides</dt><dt>4.3. Preparation of peptide library</dt><dt>4.4. Library stock plate preparation</dt><dt>4.5. Peptide sequencing</dt><dt>4.6. Ad infectivity by bulk fluorescence</dt><dt>4.7. MTT toxicity assay</dt><dt>4.8. Measurements of Ad capsid stability</dt><dt>4.9. Sarcin assay</dt><dt>4.10. Microscopy with fluorescently labeled adenovirus</dt><dt>4.11. Liposome dye release</dt><dt>4.12. ATR-FTIR sample preparation</dt><dt>4.13. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy</dt></dl><dt>Acknowledgements</dt><dt> Supplementary data</dt><dt>References</dt></dl>

1. Introduction

Most pathogenic human viruses use cellular endocytic pathways to gain entry into cells (Fig. 1).¹^,²^and³ However, the capacity of a virus to appropriate this pathway is intimately tied to its ability to effectively enter and vacate the endosome prior to degradation or recycling. Interestingly, to escape from endosomes many enveloped and non-enveloped viruses depend critically on the natural endosomal acidification process to trigger conformational changes in their viral proteins required for membrane fusion or lysis of endosomes.¹^,²^and³ We hypothesized that membrane-associating cyclic peptides might effectively block key steps involved in virus entry into or escape from endosomes and thus provide a class of antiviral agents with broad-spectrum activity. Toward this goal, we chose to explore the utility of membrane-active cyclic d,l-α-peptides in inhibiting adenovirus (Ad) infections in mammalian cells.

[SIZE=-1]

(38K)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Figure 1. (a) Schematic depiction of the early stages of adenovirus (Ad) infection cycle. Following binding of Ad to its receptor, the virus is internalized via clathrin-mediated endocytsis. Once in the early endosome, active acidification leads to pH-dependent partial disassembly of the Ad capsid and escape from the endosome via membrane lysis. (b) Studies reported here suggest that membrane associating cyclic d,l-α-peptides incorporate into endosomal membranes during the virus internalization and exert their antiviral action by counteracting the development of low pH environment inside endosomes via the formation of membrane permeating supramolecular assemblies. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE]
​

Adenoviruses are non-enveloped viruses responsible for a variety of acute respiratory, gastrointestinal, and ocular infections in humans.⁴ We considered adenovirus to be a particularly suitable viral infection model for testing our hypothesis because of its well-characterized life cycle that includes efficient cell entry via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and a pH-dependent endosomal escape (Fig. 1).⁵^and⁶ We utilized a directed combinatorial approach to select amphiphilic cyclic d,l-α-peptides that could potentially prevent adenovirus infection. It has been shown that appropriately designed cyclic d,l-α-peptides can rapidly permeate selected cellular membranes by mechanisms that are thought to involve cyclic d,l-α-peptide uptake and self-assembly into membrane-permeating supramolecular peptide nanotubes (Fig. 2c).⁷^,⁸^and⁹ Importantly, members of this class of synthetic membrane-active species have been shown recently to display good in vivo efficacies.⁹^and¹⁰

[SIZE=-1]

(47K)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Figure 2. (a) Composition of the cyclic d,l-α-peptide library (brackets indicate cyclic backbone and underlined residues indicate d-amino acids). (b) Structure and sequence of peptide 1, identified in initial screens as inhibitory of adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. (c) Schematic illustration depicting plausible modes of cyclic d,l-α-peptide self-assembly into membrane permeating supramolecular peptide nanotubes. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE]
​

2. Results and discussion

We designed a single-compound-per-bead combinatorial eight-residue cyclic d,l-α-peptide library with a relatively narrow amphiphilic sequence space to direct the potential antiviral activity toward membrane-active species (Fig. 2a). Four hundred randomly selected members of the library were screened for their ability to inhibit adenovirus infections of human epithelial cells (HeLa). A recombinant Ad5-GFP virus expressing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker was used to quantitatively assess the extent of Ad-mediated transfection by the fluorescence readout of GFP transgene expression. Each peptide sample was initially screened at 10 μM for the ability to inhibit Ad5-GFP transfection and at 50 μM for potential cytotoxicity to HeLa cells using a standard MTT assay of metabolic activity. Members of the peptide library that satisfied both criteria (apparent IC₅₀ < 10 and LD₅₀ > 50 μM) were identified using automated HPLC-MS/MS sequencing.¹¹ Among the 20 hits identified, peptide 1 (Fig. 2b), which exhibited substantial inhibition of Ad5-mediated gene delivery, was synthesized on large scale and used in the following studies.
Peptide 1 was shown to cause dose-dependent inhibition of Ad-mediated gene delivery to HeLa cells (IC₅₀ = 5 μM) (Fig. 3a, Figure S1) and was not cytotoxic in the active dose range of 5?10 μM (LD₅₀ = 57 μM at 4 h) even after prolonged exposure (LD₅₀ = 38 μM at 48 h). The inhibitory activity was not cell line specific with maximal inhibition (>95%) occurring at

7 μM for the four cell lines tested (Fig. 3a, Table S1). Furthermore, HeLa cells remained viable when exposed to the active dose range of 1 and Ad5-GFP, ruling out the possibility of synergistic cytotoxicity as the result of the active infection process. Cells treated with peptide 1 4 h after addition of Ad5-GFP showed no change in infectivity as a function of peptide concentration (Fig. 3a), suggesting that the peptide did not alter normal cellular functions including transcription or translation of Ad delivered GFP, but was required during the early stages of infection to reveal its antiviral activity. To elucidate the mechanism of antiviral activity, we systematically examined the effect of 1 on various early steps of the adenovirus infection pathway (Fig. 1a).

[SIZE=-1]

(15K)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Figure 3. (a) Dose-dependent inhibition of adenovirus-mediated gene delivery as measured by fluorescence for four different cell lines infected with Ad5-GFP, including treatment of HeLa cells after infection. (b) Percent inhibition of adenovirus-mediated gene delivery for Ad5-GFP and two Ad5 fiber chimeras that use different cell receptors. (c) Dose-dependent activity of peptide 1 against HeLa cells expressing either WT or Lys₄₄Ala mutant dynamin, a protein involved in the clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the virus. All fluorescence values are normalized to untreated cells, and the mutant dynamin fluorescence is normalized to that of wild type for comparison. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE]
​

Recent studies have shown a correlation between Ad capsid stability and the ability of adenovirus to escape from endosomal compartments. However, the apparent in vitro stability of Ad5 remained unchanged in the presence of 1 as judged by the temperature-dependent extent of Ad capsid permeability to the DNA intercalating dye TOTO (Figure S2).¹² Moreover, when Ad particles were first incubated for 30 min with 10 μM peptide 1 and then diluted 10-fold upon addition to cells, for a final concentration well below the active dose, the extent of Ad-mediated gene delivery was similar to that of untreated virus (data not shown). Therefore, we concluded that the antiviral activity of 1 was not a result of perturbations of virus particles.
We examined whether the peptide interferes with host cell functions including receptor engagement (Fig. 1a). Although most of the 51 different Ad serotypes, including Ad5, use the Coxsackie Adenovirus Receptor (CAR) as their primary cell surface receptor, certain subgroup B (e.g., Ad16) and D adenoviruses (e.g., Ad37) use the membrane cofactor protein CD46.¹³^,¹⁴^and¹⁵ We reasoned that if peptide 1 selectively inhibited Ad5 interactions with CAR, it would be unlikely that it could also inhibit Ad5.F16 and Ad5.F37, which are modified Ad5-GFP viruses displaying fiber proteins that mediate receptor binding to alternate cell receptors.¹⁶ We found that in the presence of peptide 1 (10 μM), the relative inhibition of gene delivery was similar to the pseudotyped Ad-GFP vectors (Fig. 3b). Therefore, peptide 1 does not inhibit receptor-mediated Ad cell attachment.
Previous studies have shown that the overexpression of a mutant form of the protein dynamin (Lys₄₄ → Ala) significantly inhibits adenovirus infection through the clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway.¹⁷^and¹⁸ Using a cell line stably transfected with a plasmid for mutant dynamin under tetracycline-controlled promoter, we directly compared the influence of peptide 1 on Ad infectivity when this pathway was active or substantially restricted. These studies indicate that the peptide did not differentially impact virus infection in cells expressing WT or mutant dynamin (Fig. 3c). Therefore, peptide 1 does not seem to interfere with the clathrin/dynamin-mediated internalization of adenovirus.
It has been demonstrated that the low pH environment of the endosome induces the partial disassembly of the Ad particle, exposing a membranolytic capsid protein that lyses the endosomal membrane allowing the virus to escape to the cytoplasm.⁶ To investigate whether peptide 1 impacted the ability of the virus to escape from endosomes, cells were infected with varying amounts of Ad in the presence of a fixed concentration of α-sarcin, a 150-residue ribonuclease that targets 28S ribosomal RNA. During the infection process, α-sarcin is co-internalized with Ad into endosomes and subsequently escapes into the cytoplasm upon virus-mediated lysis of the endosomal membrane.¹⁹ The cytosolic α-sarcin then inactivates ribosomes, leading to a decreased protein translation that can be monitored by the levels of ³⁵S-labeled methionine incorporation into nascent protein chains. Strikingly, treatment of cells with peptide 1 (10 μM) led to a 30-fold increase in the quantity of adenovirus required to cause a 50% decrease in [³⁵S]Met incorporation as compared to cells infected in the absence of the peptide (Fig. 4a). This finding strongly suggested that peptide 1 exerts its antiviral action by restricting virus escape from the endosome (Fig. 1b). Given the membrane permeating activity of selected amphiphilic cyclic d,l-α-peptides (Fig. 2c)⁷^,⁸^and⁹, it seemed plausible that peptide 1 might act by collapsing or preventing the formation of endosomal transmembrane proton gradient.²⁰^,²¹^,²²^and²³ However, the fact that peptide 1 in the presence or absence of Ad did not promote entry of the 17 kDa α-sarcin suggests that the putative endosomal membrane permeation is not as a direct result of membrane lysis or formation of large transmembrane pores.

[SIZE=-1]

(14K)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Figure 4. (a) Adenovirus mediated uptake of ribonuclease α-sarcin in the presence and absence of 1 as measured by radiolabeled ³⁵S-Met incorporation. The increase in the quantity of Ad necessary for 50% incorporation of the radiolabel suggests that peptide 1 prevents virus escape from the endosome. (b) The same assay using type A influenza in place of adenovirus leads to a similar decrease in virus-induced α-sarcin uptake. (c) Peptide mediated permeation of synthetic liposomes containing sulforhodamine-B dye by peptides 1 and 7. Peptide was added at 60 s to a final concentration of 10 μM. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE]
​

The effect of peptide 1 on endosomal pH during the adenovirus infection was directly assessed by fluorescence microscopy and image analysis using carboxyfluorescein (CF)-labeled virus particles.²⁴^,²⁵^and²⁶ Previous observations have revealed that the adenovirus escape from endosomes is rapid and can hamper analysis of CF-labeled Ad in acidic intracellular compartments.²⁵ To more accurately measure the pH in the virus-containing vesicles, we used Ad2-ts1, a temperature sensitive adenovirus mutant that is defective in its ability to escape from endosomes, but otherwise similar to the wild type virus with respect to CAR receptor binding and internalization.²⁷ In the presence or absence of peptide 1 (10 μM), the intracellular localization of CF-Ad2-ts1 in cells showed similar punctuate perinuclear fluorescence (Figs. 5a and b). The environmental pH values of internalized viral particles were determined using ratiometric (I_488nm/I_457nm) analysis of CF-Ad2-ts1 fluorescence based on a standard curve generated from images collected for CF-Ad2-ts1 infected cells incubated at various pH values (Figure S3).²⁴^and²⁵ In untreated cells, the environmental pH of CF-Ad2-ts1 exhibited a tendency towards acidic values with an average pH of 5.3 (Fig. 5c, open symbols). This likely reflects the different stages of virus trafficking from initially coated pits at neutral pH to acidified late endosomes. In striking contrast, the environmental pH of CF-Ad2-ts1 in cells treated with 1 had a more restricted range of pH values with an average value of 6.8 (Fig. 5c, filled symbols). These findings indicate that 1 inhibits endosomal acidification, a process crucial for virus escape from endosomes (Fig. 1).

[SIZE=-1]

(67K)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Figure 5. (a) Representative fluorescence microscopy image of cells infected with CF-Ad2-ts1; (b) representative image of cells infected with CF-Ad2-ts1 in the presence of 10 μM of peptide 1; (c) population distribution of environmental pH for particles from images taken in the presence or absence of peptide 1. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE]
​

We reasoned that if peptide 1 was capable of blocking Ad escape from endosomes via disruption of endosomal pH gradients, it should also restrict the cell entry of other pH-dependent viral pathogens.¹^,²^and³ To probe this possibility, we analyzed the extent of α-sarcin delivery induced by type A influenza virus (WSN), an enveloped virus that enters cells via pH-dependent membrane fusion from within endocytic vesicles.²⁸ The uptake of α-sarcin has been previously shown to correlate with the entry of enveloped viruses.²³ Similarly, we observed titer-dependent α-sarcin uptake mediated by type A influenza virus (Fig. 4b, open circles). Remarkably, peptide 1 (10 μM) significantly reduced influenza virus-mediated α-sarcin delivery (Fig. 4b, closed circles) and was not toxic at this dose to the MDCK cells used in the assay (LD₅₀ = 93 μM).
There remained a possibility that the antiviral activity of peptide 1 might not derive from the postulated pH effects caused by the peptide assembly-mediated endosomal membrane permeation but instead from the inhibition of vacuolar proton ATPases (V-ATPase). V-ATPases are large transmembrane proton pumps responsible for the production of low pH environments in a variety of intracellular vesicles including endosomes.²⁹ The antibiotic bafilomycin is a potent inhibitor of V-ATPase and has been shown to prevent endosomal acidification and viral entry.²¹^,²³^and³⁰ We designed and studied a number of peptide 1 analogues to probe whether the antiviral activity of 1 resulted from its specific molecular interactions with V-ATPase or other receptors (Table 1). The possibility of a receptor/ligand-mediated mechanism of action is unlikely since the enantiomeric sequence 10 and the retro-peptide 11 both display antiviral activities similar to that of 1 (Table 1). The antiviral activities of the single alanine-scan analogues (peptides 2?9) also support the membrane permeation mode of action. Substitution of either tryptophan residue in the putative membrane-interacting hydrophobic segment of peptide 1 with alanine (peptides 7 and 9) abolished the antiviral activity. Moreover, peptide 6 with four contiguous hydrophobic residues, instead of three in 1, showed a decrease in membrane selectivity (lower LD₅₀ value). Alanine substitutions in the hydrophilic portion of the sequence were well tolerated in peptides 2 and 5 but not in peptides 3 and 4, providing further support to our working model that membrane partitioning is primarily mediated by hydrophobic side chains while membrane selectivity can be greatly influenced by the interactions of hydrophilic side chains with cell membrane constituents. The low cytoxicity of 1 (LD₅₀/IC₅₀ > 10) and its analogues, and lack of apparent adverse effects on cell viability at the effective antiviral dose range could also be related to the differential uptake or self-assembly of the cyclic d,l-α-peptides in specialized membrane domains. It has been suggested that entry of some viruses is enhanced by lipid microdomains that function to increase the local concentration of molecules involved in cell entry.¹^and³¹ Therefore, it is tantalizing to speculate that the source of observed membrane selectivity might stem from selective peptide interactions with these specialized membrane domains. Several natural antimicrobial peptides, in particular, defensins, have also been shown to display in vitro antiviral activities.³²^,³³^,³⁴^and³⁵ In some cases, the binding of the peptides to viral glycoproteins (lectin-like behavior) has been implicated as the potential mechanism of antiviral action. However, in light of our findings and the well-known membrane permeating activity of many natural antimicrobial peptides, the possibility exists that some of these peptides may also operate by inhibiting virus escape from endosomes.

[SIZE=-1]

Table 1. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]In vitro antiviral activity and cytotoxicity of cyclic d,l-α-peptides <table border="1" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup span="4"> <col><col><col><col></colgroup><thead> <tr> <th align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]Compound[/SIZE]</th><th align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]Sequence[/SIZE]</th><th align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]IC₅₀ (μM)^a^,^b[/SIZE]</th><th align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]LD₅₀ (μM)^b[/SIZE]</th> </tr></thead> <tbody> <tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]1[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]5[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]57[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]2[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[</tt>A<tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]8[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]54[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]3[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt>A<tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]13[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]70[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]4[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt><tt>H</tt>A<tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]19[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]>100[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]5[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt>A<tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]7[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]65[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]6[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt>A<tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]6[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]43[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]7[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt>A<tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]>30[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]>100[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]8[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt>A<tt>W</tt><tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]17[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]100[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]9[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[S</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt>A<tt>]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]>30[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]>100[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]10[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[</tt><tt>S</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]7[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]63[/SIZE]</td> </tr><tr> <td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]11[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" align="left" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]c<tt>[</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>L</tt><tt>W</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>R</tt><tt>K</tt><tt>H</tt><tt>S]</tt>[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]5[/SIZE]</td><td class="nowrap" valign="center">[SIZE=-1]35[/SIZE]</td> </tr></tbody> </table> ^a Inhibition of Adenovirus (Ad-5) infections.
^b HeLa cells were used in both assays.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE]
​

Biophysical studies in synthetic model membranes with lipid compositions selected to mimic those of early endosomes also support the membrane permeation mode of action.³⁶ The addition of peptide 1 to sulforhodamine-B dye-entrapped liposomes led to a rapid increase in fluorescence due to release of the dye into solution as the result of liposomal membrane permeation (Fig. 4c). The Trp → Ala analogue 7, which showed decreased ability to inhibit Ad infections, was also less active than 1 in this model (Fig. 4c). Attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FT-IR spectroscopy of peptide 1 in oriented 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) lipid multilayers shows amide-A (NH stretch), amide-I, and amide-II bands characteristic of tightly hydrogen bonded antiparallel β-sheet structures seen in self-assembled peptide nanotubes (Figure S4 and Table S2).⁸^and⁹ Quantitative measurements indicate that the amphiphilic peptide assemblies are oriented at a 66 ? 5? tilt angle from the membrane normal, consistent with a carpet-like mode of action (Fig. 2c).
3. Conclusion

Despite remarkable achievements in recent years, the most commonly employed strategy of inhibiting species-specific viral proteins typically affords narrow-spectrum antiviral therapeutics that are subject to deactivation by the rampant evolution of drug resistant viral species. We speculate that the supramolecular approach described here, by virtue of acting on a common cellular pathway involved in many virus infections, might offer a new opportunity in the rational design of broad-spectrum antiviral agents that are less prone to the development of resistance. However, despite the promising initial findings reported here, for the practical utility of this new class of antiviral agents to be seriously contemplated, cyclic d,l-α-peptides with significantly wider therapeutic indices need to be fashioned.
4. Materials and methods

4.1. General

2-(1H-Benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU), 2-Cl-trityl chloride resin, and all protected amino acids were purchased from Novabiochem. (7-Azabenzotriazole-1-tloxy)tripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate (PyAOP) was purchased from Aldrich. Lipids were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. Sulforhodamine B was obtained from Molecular Probes. Dulbecco?s modified Eagle?s medium (DMEM) was obtained from Invitrogen and supplemented with 10% FBS. Solvents and all other reagents were purchased from Aldrich or Fisher unless otherwise noted. All peptide stock solutions used for biological assays were prepared in 5% DMSO/saline unless otherwise noted. An E1/E3-deleted Ad5 vector encoding the gene for EGFP under control of the CMV promoter was propagated as previously described.⁶
4.2. Synthesis of cyclic d,l-α-peptides¹¹

Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OAllyl³⁷ (1.0 mmol/g of resin to be loaded) was treated with 1:1 TFA/CH₂Cl₂ for 1 h. The solution was concentrated to dryness by rotary evaporation, and subjected to high vacuum to remove the residual TFA. The crude material was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂, and DIEA was added (4.0 equiv relative to amino acid). This solution was transferred to a sintered peptide synthesis vessel containing 2-Cl-trityl chloride polystyrene resin. The mixture was agitated on a shaker for 4 h. The vessel was then drained, and the resin was washed with CH₂Cl₂ (3 ? 1 min), 8:2:1 CH₂Cl₂/MeOH/DIEA (2 ? 10 min), CH₂Cl₂ (3 ? 1 min), and MeOH. After drying under vacuum, loading was measured by UV quantification of Fmoc release after treatment with 20% piperidine/DMF.
The orthogonally protected Fmoc-Lys-OAllyl loaded trityl resin prepared above (0.10 mmol) was placed in a sintered glass peptide synthesis vessel and swollen in CH₂Cl₂ for 45 min. The resin was washed twice with DMF, treated with 20% piperidine/DMF (2 ? 8 min), to remove the Fmoc group, and washed again with DMF (3?). For each coupling, a solution of the Fmoc-protected amino acid (0.40 mmol), HBTU (148 mg, 0.39 mmol), and diisopropylethylamine (175 μl, 1.0 mmol) in DMF (2 ml) was allowed to prereact for 2 min, then added to the resin. The resin suspension was agitated for 30 min, drained, and washed with DMF (3?). This deprotection?coupling cycle was repeated until the desired linear peptide sequence was obtained.
The resin bearing full-length linear peptide was washed with CH₂Cl₂, then suspended in 8:2:1 CH₂Cl₂/N-methylmorpholine/acetic acid. The mixture was degassed by bubbling Ar for 10 min. Pd(PPh₃)₄ (58 mg, 0.05 mmol) was added and the mixture was degassed for an additional 5 min. The vessel was then sealed and agitated for 4 h. The vessel was then drained, and the resin was washed with CH₂Cl₂, DMF, 5% DIEA/DMF, 0.5% w/v sodium diethyldithiocarbamate in DMF, and finally once again with DMF. The N-terminal Fmoc group was then removed by treatment with 20% piperidine/DMF (2 ? 8 min), and the resin was washed with DMF (3?) and 5% DIEA in DMF (3?).
PyAOP (307 mg, 0.6 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (2 ml). DIEA (0.209 ml, 1.2 mmol) was added and the solution was transferred to the vessel containing the linear peptide on resin. The mixture was agitated for 4 h, drained, and washed with DMF (3?). In some cases, the cyclization was repeated with fresh reagents to drive the reaction to completion. The resin was washed with DMF, CH₂Cl₂, and MeOH and dried under vacuum. The peptide was cleaved from the resin by treatment with a mixture of 81.5% TFA:5% thioanisole:5% phenol:5% water:2.5% 1,2-ethanedithiol:1% triisopropylsilane for 4 h. The cleavage solution was collected by filtration and the crude peptide was precipitated by addition of cold ether. The suspension was centrifuged, decanted, and the solid was washed twice more with ether. The solid was dried under vacuum to yield crude peptide. All peptides were purified by preparative RP-HPLC on a C₁₈ column to better than 95% purity as determined by analytical HPLC. Identity of the purified products was confirmed by MALDI- or ESI-MS.
4.3. Preparation of peptide library

A library of peptides was prepared using a split-and-pool approach based as previously reported.¹¹ Briefly, the method is based on the general protocol for peptide synthesis described above with the following modifications. Trityl-chloride loaded polystyrene macrobead resin (Peptides International) was used as the solid support. Reaction times were extended to 3 min for each wash, 15 min for each deprotection, and 90 min for each coupling. Coupling reactions were carried out with 5 equiv of Fmoc-amino acid, 4.95 equiv HBTU, and 12.5 equiv diisopropylethylamine (quantities based on approximate resin quantity after splitting). Allyl removal and cyclization reactions were each carried out twice for 5?6 h. After washing as described above, the beads were dried under high vacuum and stored at 4 ?C.
4.4. Library stock plate preparation

Dried macrobeads from the above library were individually arrayed into wells of a 96-well polypropylene plate. A mixture of 95:2.5:2.5 TFA/water/triethylsilane (

100 μl/well) was added, and the plate was covered. After 4 h, the cleavage mixture was removed under a stream of nitrogen followed by additional drying in a vacuum desiccator. To this crude residue and the remaining bead was added DMSO (10 μl/well) followed by PBS, pH 7.0 (90 μl/well). Based on resin loading, the concentration of these stock solutions was approximately 1 mM.
4.5. Peptide sequencing

Unknown peptides were sequenced using HPLC-MS/MS with software for automated analysis of fragmentation spectra as previously described.¹¹
4.6. Ad infectivity by bulk fluorescence

Cells were plated onto tissue culture treated, clear bottomed, black 96-well plates (200 μl/well, 5000 cells/well). The cells were incubated in DMEM +10% FBS for 24 h at 37 ?C under an atmosphere of 5% CO₂. Peptide stock solution (20 μl/well, triplicate for each concentration) was added followed by virus (20 μl/well, 1.25 ? 10⁹ particles/ml in TBS). The cells were then incubated for 4 h at 37 ?C. After 4 h, the medium was removed, fresh medium was added, and the cells were allowed to incubate for an additional 24 h at 37 ?C. After 24 h, the medium was removed and the cells were washed twice with HBS and left under HBS (100 μl/well). The plates were then scanned on a Molecular Dynamics Fluorimager 595. The integrated intensity of GFP fluorescence for each well was determined using the accompanying software. These values were background corrected against wells containing uninfected cells, and triplicate conditions were averaged.
4.7. MTT toxicity assay

Cells were plated onto tissue culture treated, clear bottomed, black 96-well plates (200 μl/well, 5000 cells/well). The cells were incubated for 48 h at 37 ?C. Peptide stock solution (20 μl/well, triplicate for each concentration) was added and the cells were incubated in the presence of peptide for 4 h at 37 ?C. After 4 h, the medium was removed and fresh medium was added along with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (100 μl/well of a 0.2 mg/ml solution in DMEM). The cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 ?C, washed, and dissolved in DMSO (100 μl/well). The plate was allowed to stand at 37 ?C for 20 min to completely dissolve the formazan precipitate. The absorbance at 560 nm was then measured on a Molecular Devices SpectraMAX 250 microplate reader. Replicate wells were background corrected, averaged, and divided by the value obtained for untreated cells on the same plate to obtain relative metabolic activity for peptide treated cells.
4.8. Measurements of Ad capsid stability

The thermal stability of the Ad capsid following exposure to 1 was measured by the changes in accessibility of the viral DNA to a fluorescent interacalating dye, TOTO-1 (Molecular Probes), as previously described with minor modifications.⁶^and¹² Briefly, 100 μg/ml Ad5 was incubated with 60 nM TOTO-1 in 50 mM Hepes, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5. The fluorescence emission of TOTO-1 was monitored as a function of temperature using an ABI Prism 7900HT real-time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems) programmed to measure fluorescence (λ_ex 488 nm, λ_em 540 nm) every 2.5 ?C between 20 and 70 ?C. Samples were equilibrated at each temperature for 2 min prior to measurement.
4.9. Sarcin assay

Cells (HeLa for Ad5; MDCK for influenza) were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 10,000 cells/well for 24 h prior to infection. One hour prior to infection, cells were washed once with DMEM without cysteine or methionine and supplemented with 10 mM Hepes, 2 mM glutamine, and 0.5% BSA with penicillin and streptomycin (abbreviated DMEM- hereafter) and incubated in DMEM- for 1 h at 37 ?C. The medium was then removed and cells were incubated with DMEM- containing 0.1 mg/ml α-sarcin (Sigma) and either Ad5 ranging from 1 to 1 ? 10⁻³ μg/ml or Influenza A ranging from 0.1 to 1 ? 10⁴ PFU/ml, in the presence or absence of 10 μM of 1, for 2 h at 37 ?C. The cells were then washed once with DMEM- and incubated with DMEM- containing 0.1 μCi of [³⁵S]l-methionine (Amersham Biosciences) per well for an additional 2 h at 37 ?C. The cells were then washed twice with 100 μl of 20 mM TBS, pH 7.4, incubated with 50 μl of ice-cold 5% TCA at 4 ?C for one hour and then centrifuged at 1000g for 15 min at 4 ?C and washed twice with cold ethanol. The pellet was then dissolved overnight in 5 μl of 1% SDS, 0.1 N NaOH at 4 ?C on a rotary shaker. The resulting solutions were neutralized with 1 μl of 0.6 N HCl and 34 μl of MicroScint 20 liquid scintillation cocktail (Packard) was added to each well followed by vortexing. Radioactivity was measured using a Topcount (Packard) 96-well liquid scintillation counter.
4.10. Microscopy with fluorescently labeled adenovirus

The Ad temperature sensitive mutant, ts1, was labeled with approximately three molecules of carboxyfluorescein (CF) succimidyl ester (Molecular Probes) per hexon protein as previously described.²⁵ Similar labeling of wild type Ad2 maintained

85% of the original infectivity. HeLa cells (7 ? 10⁴ cells/well) were grown overnight on glass coverslips in 24-well plates in DMEM. Cells were washed with ice-cold DMEM and incubated on ice for 10 min before adding 5 ? 10⁴ particles per cell of CF-ts1 and incubated further on ice for 1 h. Unbound virus was removed with three washes of ice-cold DMEM and then warmed medium was added with or without 10 μM peptide 1 and incubated at 37 ?C for 20 min. Cells were then placed on ice and washed three times with ice-cold PBS. Coverslips were mounted with PBS containing 2.5% (w/v) DABCO, pH 7.4, and examined by laser scanning confocal microscopy. In additional samples, cells were infected with CF-ts1 in conditions identical to those mentioned above, fixed for 10 min with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and mounted in PBS containing 2.5% w/v DABCO at specific pH values in the presence of the ionophores nigericin (20 μM) and monensin (10 μM). These samples were used as standards to generate a curve for pH calibration.
Imaging of CF-labeled virions was performed using a Bio-Rad 2100 confocal laser scanning microscope. Images were sequentially scanned at 457 and 488 nm using a 60? 1.4N.A. objective. The environmental pH of internalized CF-ts1 was determined by employing the pH-dependence of the I_{488 nm}/I_{457 nm} ratio. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (NIH). Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected using 488 nm excitation images by thresholding and selecting regions composed of a minimum of 10 pixels to minimize contributions from noise. Typically, 150?200 ROIs were identified per field. Based on the standard curve generated from cells mounted in different pH media, ratios in peptide untreated and treated samples were converted to a pH value. Histograms were generated with ROI?s binned in 0.4 pH unit increments. Two fields were analyzed for each sample, and three replicate samples were averaged for each experimental condition.
4.11. Liposome dye release

Liposomes were prepared using the technique of reverse phase evaporation. A 16 mM solution in chloroform containing phosphatidylcholine (PC, egg), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE, egg), phosphatidylinositol (PI, soy), phosphatidylserine (PS, egg), sphingomyelin (SM, egg), gangliosides (porcine), and cholesterol was prepared in molar ratio of 5 PC:1 PE:1 PI:1 PS:1 SM:1 gangliosides:3 cholesterol. 2.5 ml of this solution was transferred to a degassed flask under argon. Ether (1 ml) was added followed by 2 ml of a 100 mM solution of sulforhodamine B in Dulbecco?s PBS. The flask was sealed under argon, and sonicated for 7 min in an ice cooled bath. Most of the organics were removed by rotary evaporation, and an additional 1.5 ml of PBS was added. After an additional 5 min of rotary evaporation, the solution was transferred to a syringe and passed through stacked 200 and 400 μm filters. The solution was then transferred to a Sephadex G-25 column and eluted with PBS. The liposomes which eluted as a pink band were collected and used within 24 h.
The lipid preparation from above (12.5 μl) was added to PBS (1 ml) in a fluorescence cuvette with equipped stir bar. Time-dependent fluorescence measurements were carried out on an Aminco Bowman Series 2 Luminescence Spectrometer at λ_ex = 535 nm and λ_em = 585 nm. Measurements were taken in 1 s intervals with stirring. After 1 min of background measurement, peptide (10 μl of a 10 mM solution in DMSO) was added to the sample. After the fluorescence stabilized (

10 min), Triton X-100 (25 μl of a 10% solution in H₂O) was added. Normalized fluorescence values (I_n) were calculated as follows:


<table border="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="center"><td align="center" width="95%"></td></tr></tbody></table>

where I_t, I₀, and I_∞ are the fluorescence values at time t, time 0, and after addition of Triton X-100, respectively.4.12. ATR-FTIR sample preparation⁸

1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC, Avanti Polar Lipids) (20 mg) was transferred to a degassed flask. Chloroform (1 ml) was added followed by ether (1 ml) and water (2 ml). The flask was sealed under argon and placed in an ice cooled sonicator for 7 min. The flask was then transferred to a rotary evaporator and evaporated until foaming was no longer observed. Water (2 ml) was added, and the suspension was placed on the rotary evaporator for an additional 10 min. Peptide (16 μl of a 10 mM solution in DMSO) was added to a portion of this lipid preparation (184 μl) for a final concentration of 6.8 mM DMPC, 0.8 mM peptide in 8% DMSO/water. This mixture was vortexed periodically over a 10-min period and passed through a pre-wetted column of Sephadex-G25. One hundred microliters of the resulting mixture was deposited on a 45 ? Ge-ATR mirror (Spectra Tech) and allowed to dry several hours in air then for 3 h in a vacuum dessicator.
4.13. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy

Spectra were collected on a Nicolet 550 Magna Series II FT-IR instrument with a liquid nitrogen cooled mercury?cadmium?telluride detector under a nitrogen atmosphere. The multibilayer coated mirror mentioned above was fitted on a baseline horizontal ATR optical bench with a ZnSe polarizer (Spectra Tech). Each spectrum represents an average of 800 scans obtained at a resolution of 2 cm⁻¹. The spectra were processed with Omnic (Nicolet) with ATR correction against a background consisting of the empty mirror at the same polarization angle, and further baseline corrected manually. The final spectra were subjected to exponential smoothing using Mathematica (Wolfram Research). Calculation of lipid and cyclic peptide orientation angles was carried out as previously described for this class of compounds.⁸

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues Prof. S. Schmid, for providing samples of the K44A dynamin transfected HeLa cells, and Prof. L. Sherman, for samples of influenza A virus. We are grateful to NSF for a Predoctoral Fellowship to W.S.H. and NIH for a NRSA Postdoctoral Fellowship to C.M.W. (AI007354). This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM52190 to M.R.G.) and (HL54352 and EY11431 to G.R.N.).

 

[Mingus]

Re: Antiviral cyclic d,l-α-peptides: Targeting a general biochemical pathway in virus

Re: Antiviral cyclic d,l-α-peptides: Targeting a general biochemical pathway in virus

References and notes

1 D.S. Dimitirov, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2 (2004), pp. 109?122.
2 S.B. Sieczkarski and G.R. Whittaker, Curr. Top. Microbiol. 285 (2005), pp. 1?23. Abstract-MEDLINE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
3 L. Carrasco, FEBS Lett. 350 (1994), pp. 151?154. Abstract | Abstract + References | PDF (473 K) | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
4 S.A. Lukashok and M.S. Horwitz, Curr. Clin. Top. Infect. Dis. 18 (1998), pp. 286?305. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
5 P.L. Stewart, T.S. Dermody and G.R. Nemerow, Adv. Protein Chem. 64 (2003), pp. 455?491. Abstract | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
6 C.M. Wiethoff, H. Wodrich, L. Gerace and G.R. Nemerow, J. Virol. 79 (2005), pp. 1992?2000. Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
7 M.R. Ghadiri, J.R. Granja and L.K. Buehler, Nature 369 (1994), pp. 301?304. Abstract-INSPEC | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
8 H.S. Kim, J.D. Hartgerink and M.R. Ghadiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998), pp. 4417?4424. Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract-EMBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
9 S. Fernandez-Lopez, H.-S. Kim, E.C. Choi, M. Delgado, J.R. Granja, A. Khasanov, K. Kraehenbuehl, G. Long, D.A. Weinberger, K.M. Wilcoxen and M.R. Ghadiri, Nature 412 (2001), pp. 452?456. Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
10 Dartois, V.; Sanchez-Quesada, J.; Cabezas, E.; Chi, E.; Dubbelde, C.; Dunn, C.; Granja, J.; Gritzen, C.; Weinberger, D.; Ghadiri, M. R.; Parr, T. R., Jr.; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., in press.
11 J.E. Redman, K.M. Wilcoxen and M.R. Ghadiri, J. Comb. Chem. 5 (2003), pp. 33?40. Abstract-MEDLINE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
12 J. Rexroad, C.M. Wiethoff, A.P. Green, T.D. Kierstead, M.O. Scott and C.R. Middaugh, J. Pharm. Sci. 92 (2003), pp. 665?678. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
13 J.M. Bergelson, J.A. Cunningham, G. Droguett, E.A. Kurt-Jones, A. Krithivas, J.S. Hong, M.S. Horwitz, R.L. Crowell and R.W. Finberg, Science 275 (1997), pp. 1320?1323. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
14 D. Sirena, B. Lilienfeld, M. Eisenhut, S. Kaelin, K. Boucke, R.R. Beerli, L. Vogt, C. Ruedl, M.F. Bachmann, U.F. Greber and S. Hemmi, J. Virol. 78 (2004), pp. 4454?4462. Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
15 E. Wu, S.A. Trauger, L. Pache, T.-M. Mullen, D.J. Von Seggern, G. Siuzdak and G.R. Nemerow, J. Virol. 78 (2004), pp. 3897?3905. Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
16 D.J. Von Seggern, S. Huang, S.K. Fleck, S.C. Stevenson and G.R. Nemerow, J. Virol. 74 (2000), pp. 354?362. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
17 H. Damke, T. Baba, D.E. Warnock and S.L. Schmid, J. Cell Biol. 127 (1994), pp. 915?934. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract-EMBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
18 K. Wang, S. Huang, A. Kapoor-Munshi and G. Nemerow, J. Virol. 72 (1998), pp. 3455?3458. Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE
19 C. Fernandez-Puentes and L. Carrasco, Cell 20 (1980), pp. 769?775. Abstract | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
20 A. Irurzun, J.L. Nieva and L. Carrasco, Virology 227 (1997), pp. 488?492. Abstract | PDF (630 K) | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
21 M. Merion, P. Schlesinger, R.M. Brooks, J.M. Moehring, T.J. Moehring and W.S. Sly, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 80 (1983), pp. 5315?5319. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
22 A.M. Tartakoff, Cell 32 (1983), pp. 1026?1028. Abstract | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
23 L. Perez and L. Carrasco, J. Gen. Virol. 75 (1994), pp. 2595?2606. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
24 S. Ohkuma and B. Poole, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75 (1978), pp. 3327?3331. Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
25 N. Miyazawa, R.G. Crystal and P.L. Leopold, J. Virol. 75 (2001), pp. 1387?1400. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract-EMBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
26 M.Y. Nakano and U.F. Greber, J. Struct. Biol. 129 (2000), pp. 57?68. Abstract | Abstract + References | PDF (515 K) | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
27 U.F. Greber, P. Webster, J. Weber and A. Helenius, EMBO J. 15 (1996), pp. 1766?1777. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
28 J.J. Skehel and D.C. Wiley, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69 (2000), pp. 531?569. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
29 S. Kawasaki-Nishi, T. Nishi and M. Forgac, FEBS Lett. 545 (2003), pp. 76?85. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (485 K) | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
30 N. Bayer, D. Schober, E. Prchla, R.F. Murphy, D. Blaas and R. Fuchs, J. Virol. 72 (1998), pp. 9645?9655. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
31 R.G.W. Anderson and K. Jacobson, Science 296 (2002), pp. 1821?1825. Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract-GEOBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
32 R.I. Lehrer, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2 (2004), pp. 727?738. Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract-Elsevier BIOBASE | Abstract-MEDLINE | Full Text via CrossRef | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
33 V.C.A. Matanic and V. Castilla, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agent 23 (2004), pp. 382?389.
34 A. Bastian and H. Schafer, Regul. Pept. 101 (2001), pp. 157?161. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (65 K) | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
35 K.A. Daher, M.E. Selsted and R.I. Lehrer, J. Virol. 60 (1986), pp. 1068?1074. Abstract-MEDLINE | Abstract-EMBASE | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
36 C. Di Simone, M.A. Zandonatti and M. Buchmeier, J. Virol. 198 (1994), pp. 455?465. Abstract | PDF (638 K) | Abstract + References in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus
37 J. Alsina, F. Rabanal, E. Giralt and F. Albericio, Tetrahedron Lett. 35 (1994), pp. 9633?9635.