tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
. 2024 Jul 6;13(1):73.
doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4. Secondary attack rate following on-site isolation of patients with suspected COVID-19 in multiple-bed rooms
Silvio Ragozzino[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard Kuehl[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Karoline Leuzinger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pascal Schläpfer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pascal Urwyler[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Durovic[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sandra Zingg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthias von Rotz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Manuel Battegay[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andreas F Widmer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hans H Hirsch[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Stefano Bassetti[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sarah Tschudin-Sutter[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.
Keywords: COVID-19; Disease outbreaks; Droplet and contact precautions; Healthcare-associated COVID-19; Infection prevention and control; Isolation on site; SARS-CoV-2; Secondary attack rate; Shared rooms; Whole-genome sequencing.
. 2024 Jul 6;13(1):73.
doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4. Secondary attack rate following on-site isolation of patients with suspected COVID-19 in multiple-bed rooms
Silvio Ragozzino[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard Kuehl[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Karoline Leuzinger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pascal Schläpfer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pascal Urwyler[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Durovic[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sandra Zingg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthias von Rotz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Manuel Battegay[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andreas F Widmer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hans H Hirsch[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Stefano Bassetti[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sarah Tschudin-Sutter[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38971822
- PMCID: PMC11227710
- DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01430-4
The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.
Keywords: COVID-19; Disease outbreaks; Droplet and contact precautions; Healthcare-associated COVID-19; Infection prevention and control; Isolation on site; SARS-CoV-2; Secondary attack rate; Shared rooms; Whole-genome sequencing.