• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control . Association of institutional masking policies with healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in Swiss acute car

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control


. 2024 Jun 18;13(1):64.
doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01422-4. Association of institutional masking policies with healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in Swiss acute care hospitals during the BA.4/5 wave (CH-SUR study): a retrospective observational study

Tamara Dörr[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sabine Güsewell[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Domenica Flury[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maria Süveges[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Camille Beatrice Gaza Valera[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sara Botero-Mesa[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Marie-Céline Zanella[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Anne Iten[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carlo Balmelli[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Nicolas Troillet[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Sarah Tschudin-Sutter[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Peter W Schreiber[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Philipp Jent[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Lauro Damonti[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Rami Sommerstein[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Lea Portmann[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Danielle Vuichard-Gysin[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Alexia Cusini[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Yvonne Nussbaumer-Ochsner[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Ulrich Heininger[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Christoph Berger[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Petra Zimmermann[SUP] 16 17 [/SUP], Céline Gardiol[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Olivia Keiser[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Matthias Schlegel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Philipp Kohler[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stefan P Kuster[SUP] 19 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: In the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, masking has been widely accepted in healthcare institutions to mitigate the risk of healthcare-associated infection. Evidence, however, is still scant and the role of masks in preventing healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 acquisition remains unclear.We investigated the association of variation in institutional mask policies with healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in acute care hospitals in Switzerland during the BA.4/5 2022 wave.
Methods: SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients between June 1 and September 5, 2022, were obtained from the "Hospital-based surveillance of COVID-19 in Switzerland"-database and classified as healthcare- or community-associated based on time of disease onset. Institutions provided information regarding institutional masking policies for healthcare workers and other prevention policies. The percentage of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections was calculated per institution and per type of mask policy. The association of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections with mask policies was tested using a negative binominal mixed-effect model.
Results: We included 2'980 SARS-CoV-2 infections from 13 institutions, 444 (15%) were classified as healthcare-associated. Between June 20 and June 30, 2022, six (46%) institutions switched to a more stringent mask policy. The percentage of healthcare-associated infections subsequently declined in institutions with policy switch but not in the others. In particular, the switch from situative masking (standard precautions) to general masking of HCW in contact with patients was followed by a strong reduction of healthcare-associated infections (rate ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.49). In contrast, when compared across hospitals, the percentage of health-care associated infections was not related to mask policies.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest switching to a more stringent mask policy may be beneficial during increases of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections at an institutional level.

Keywords: Covid-19; Healthcare workers; Healthcare-associated infection; Masking policies; SARS-CoV-2.

 
Back
Top Bottom