• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. A Randomized Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy of Two High Tigecycline Dosage Regimens Versus Imipenem/Cila

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, full text: (LINK). Abstract, edited.]

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy of Two High Tigecycline Dosage Regimens Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia


Julio Ramirez 1,*, Nathalie Dartois 2, Hassan Gandjini 2, Jean Li Yan 3, Joan Korth-Bradley 3 and Paul C. McGovern 3
Author Affiliations: <SUP>1</SUP>University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky <SUP>2</SUP>Pfizer Inc, Paris, France <SUP>3</SUP>Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania



ABSTRACT

In a previous phase 3 study, lower cure rates occurred in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia treated with tigecycline at the approved dose compared with those treated with imipenem/cilastatin. We hypothesized that a higher dose of tigecycline is necessary in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia. This phase 2 study compared the safety and efficacy of two higher doses of tigecycline with imipenem/cilastatin in subjects with hospital-acquired pneumonia. Subjects with hospital-acquired pneumonia were randomized to receive one of two doses of tigecycline (150 mg followed by 75 mg every 12 hours or 200 mg followed by 100 mg every 12 hours) or 1 gram of imipenem/cilastatin every 8 hours. Empiric adjunctive therapy was administered for initial coverage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, depending on the randomization regimen. Clinical response, defined as cure, failure, or indeterminate outcome, was assessed 10 to 21 days after the last day of therapy. In the clinically evaluable population, clinical cure with tigecycline 100 mg (17/20, 85.0%) was numerically higher compared with tigecycline 75 mg (16/23, 69.6%) and imipenem/cilastatin (18/24, 75.0%). No new safety signals with the high-dose tigecycline were identified. A numerically higher clinical response was observed with the 100 mg dose of tigecycline. This supports our hypothesis that a higher area under the concentration time-curve/MIC ratio may be necessary to achieve clinical cure in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia. Further studies are necessary.



FOOTNOTES

*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville Health Outpatient Center, 401 East Chestnut Street, Ste. 310, Louisville, KY 40202. Phone: (502) 852-5131. Fax: (502) 852-1147.E-mail: j.ramirez@louisville.edu.

Copyright ? 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
-
------
 
Back
Top Bottom