• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Antibody to the influenza neuraminidase: an independent correlate of protection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 8. pii: jiv195. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Antibody to the influenza neuraminidase: an independent correlate of protection.[/h] Monto AS[SUP]1[/SUP], Petrie JG[SUP]1[/SUP], Cross RT[SUP]1[/SUP], Johnson E[SUP]1[/SUP], Liu M[SUP]2[/SUP], Zhong W[SUP]2[/SUP], Levine M[SUP]2[/SUP], Katz JM[SUP]2[/SUP], Ohmit SE[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h]  Laboratory correlates of influenza vaccine protection can best be identified by examining those who fail vaccination. While the importance of antibody to viral hemagglutinin (HA) has long been recognized, the independent contribution to protection of antibody to viral neuraminidase (NA) has not been determined.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h]  Sera from a controlled trial of inactivated (IIV) and live attenuated (LAIV) influenza vaccine efficacy were tested by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), microneutralization (MN) and a newly standardized lectin-based neuraminidase inhibition (NAI) assay.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h]   Vaccine response measured by NAI was found in 37% of IIV recipients, as compared to 77% and 67% by HAI and MN, respectively. For LAIV, the percentages were 6%, 21% and 17%, respectively. In IIV recipients, as NAI titers rose, the frequency of vaccine failure fell, similar to that seen with HAI and MN. HAI and MN titers were highly correlated, but NAI titers less so. Analyses suggested an independent role for NAI antibody in protection which was similar in IIV, LAIV and placebo groups.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h]   While NAI antibody is not produced to a large extent in response to current IIV, it appears to have an independent role in protection. As new influenza vaccines are developed, NA content should be considered.
? The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.


PMID: 25858957 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
J Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 8. pii: jiv196. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Neuraminidase: another piece of the influenza vaccine puzzle.[/h] Eckard L[SUP]1[/SUP], Webby R[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

PMID: 25858958 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom