• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Antibody responses and cross protection against lethal influenza A viruses differ between the sexes in C57BL/6 mice

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine
In Press, Uncorrected Proof - Note to users
doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.110 | How to Cite or Link Using DOI
Permissions & Reprints

Antibody responses and cross protection against lethal influenza A viruses differ between the sexes in C57BL/6 mice

Maria E. Lorenzoa, c, 1, Andrea Hodgsona, 1, Dionne P. Robinsona, Jenifer B. Kaplana, 2, Andrew Pekosza, Sabra L. Kleina, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author
Purchase
a The W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
b Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
c Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

Received 7 April 2011; revised 22 July 2011; Accepted 23 September 2011. Available online 6 October 2011.
Abstract

A mouse model was used to determine if protective immunity to influenza A virus infection differs between the sexes. The median lethal dose of H1N1 or H3N2 was lower for na?ve females than males. After a sublethal, primary infection with H1N1 or H3N2, females and males showed a similar transient morbidity, but females generated more neutralizing and total anti-influenza A virus antibodies. Immunized males and females showed similar protection against secondary challenge with a homologous virus, but males experienced greater morbidity and had higher lung viral titers after infection with a lethal dose of heterologous virus. Females develop stronger humoral immune responses and greater cross protection against heterosubtypic virus challenge.
Highlights

► We developed a small animal model to determine if protective immunity against influenza A viruses is higher in females than males. ► We examined humoral immune responses to primary sublethal infection with H1N1 or H3N2 viruses and virus titers and morbidity following secondary lethal challenge with homologous or heterologous virus. ► Females mount higher neutralizing and total anti-influenza A virus antibodies than males. ► Males and females are equally protected against homologous virus challenge, but males experience greater morbidity and have higher viral titers in their lungs after infection with a lethal dose of heterologous virus. ► We conclude that females develop greater cross protection against influenza A viruses than males.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X11015520
 
Back
Top Bottom