• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Antibody response to seasonal influenza vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Dec 4. doi: 10.1111/ene.13537. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Antibody response to seasonal influenza vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy.[/h] Olberg HK[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Eide GE[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Cox RJ[SUP]5,[/SUP][SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Jul-Larsen ?[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Lartey SL[SUP]5,[/SUP][SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Vedeler CA[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]8[/SUP], Myhr KM[SUP]9,[/SUP][SUP]8[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] We have previously shown that multiple sclerosis patients receiving immunomodulatory treatment have reduced seroprotection rates after influenza immunization.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To further investigate the influence of immunomodulatory therapies on the antibody response and seroprotection rates in patients immunized with seasonal influenza vaccine in 2012/2013 compared to healthy controls.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Ninety patients receiving fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, interferon beta-1a/1b, natalizumab or no therapy were compared to 62 healthy controls. All subjects received the inactivated split virus vaccine in 2012 and serum samples were collected pre- and three, six and 12 months post-vaccination. The vaccine responses were evaluated by the haemagglutination inhibition assay and adjusted for age and gender.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] No significant differences in rates of protection against H1N1 for interferon beta-1a/1b and glatiramer acetate were observed as compared to controls at three, six and 12 months. Fingolimod provided reduced protection at all time points post-vaccination while natalizumab displayed reduced protection at three and six months. Patients without immunomodulation did not display significantly different protection rates as the controls at three and 12 months.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] These findings suggest that MS patients receiving fingolimod or natalizumab should be considered for a second dose of the vaccine in cases of insufficient protection. Our results further indicate that new immunomodulatory treatment regimens should be systematically evaluated for their influence on influenza-specific vaccine responses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Immunomodulation; Immunotherapy; Protection; multiple sclerosis; seasonal influenza vaccination

PMID: 29205701 DOI: 10.1111/ene.13537
 
Back
Top Bottom